Has anyone heard the new North American products preamp and amp?


The new versions are called X-10s and the amp is on its third version or Mark III. This truly provides holograph imagine unlike anything I've heard before. On symphonic orchestras, one can hear the first violins. I have never heard an amp sound this precise.

In reality, I doubt if any amplifier can rival it. I certainly have never heard any that do so. Every album is so involving.

The preamp has yet to get a remote but is nevertheless, quite striking.
tbg
geoffkait, I don't think anyone said it was a final solution for the sweet spot. I never said anything about the sweet spot nor about the final solution. You cannot win an argument by changing the topic.
If you showed a smart phone to someone in the 1600's you would be burned at the stake for witchcraft.

This is a time of incredible advancements in technology.
Still - Dolby Labs with all there millions cannot duplicate what I have done.
They have to install 27 speakers in the theaters and artificially pan sounds through separate channels to "give you the thrill of being there".
That's because they don't know how to project a stable sound object into mid air.

It is nothing more than very expensive "fake".

This amplifying method is self-evident and will easily stand the test of time.
You can't tell someone that "it's impossible" or "you can't do that" - after its already been done.

It is a moot point.

Tbg wrote,

"geoffkait, I don’t think anyone said it was a final solution for the sweet spot. I never said anything about the sweet spot nor about the final solution. You cannot win an argument by changing the topic."

But it is what you two have been saying, by claiming that an amplifier can produce "live" sound in the room, the same "live" sound from the recording venue. I am simply pointing out that that statement cannot be TRUE because there are SO MANY PROBLEMS INHERENT in the home audio system that DISTORT  the sound, not just amplifiers. Follow? 
Roger wrote,

"If you showed a smart phone to someone in the 1600’s you would be burned at the stake for witchcraft.

This is a time of incredible advancements in technology.
Still - Dolby Labs with all there millions cannot duplicate what I have done.
They have to install 27 speakers in the theaters and artificially pan sounds through separate channels to "give you the thrill of being there".
That’s because they don’t know how to project a stable sound object into mid air."

It is nothing more than very expensive "fake".

This amplifying method is self-evident and will easily stand the test of time.
You can’t tell someone that "it’s impossible" or "you can’t do that" - after its already been done.

It is a moot point."

Perhaps you misunderstand what I’m saying. I’m NOT saying your amp doesn’t work. I’m NOT saying your amp is not the only amp that does what you say. I’m NOT even saying your amp isn’t an advancement. By the way I’m not very fond of the expression, "it will stand the test of time" since obviously one would have to wait a long time to actually find out if that’s true or not. We’re not there yet. So, actually, and I hate to judge too harshly, the statements you made in the paragraphs I just quoted are simply more Strawman arguments that mischaracterize my position and sidestep the issues I raised with respect to the great number of problems INHERENT in home audio systems that distort the sound and prevent it from sounding "live." Problems other than the amplifier.