Has audiophilia changed your music taste?


Before I got into this hobby, I was big into heavy metal. I am very much into progressive bands like Dream Theater and Queensryche. My collection consisted of rock 90% and classical/jazz/other at 10%. Ever since I started getting into audio, my listening has changed and so has my music collection. What used to be 90/10, lean to rock, has changed to about 70/30 and changing weekly. Lately, I can't keep Patricia Barber off my system. I absolutely love her. The thing is, the other day I put on some Pat Travers and the listening only lasted about 30 minutes before it was back to Patricia Barber. For some reason, rock doesn't sound as good as it did before. Maybe it is my system or maybe it is me.

Anyone else like me?
matchstikman
Music has always come first for me. I have been impressed if my system does something as miraculous as make the music I have listened to somehow sound better, but ultimately it is still the performance of the music that has had my interest. More often it is that recordings sound badly recorded, and I think this awareness of recording quality -as much as I can discern it, really defines how my system has effected me. Older recordings sound less than steller.Otherwise, Audio magazines have actually expanded the scope of music I listen to simply because music reviews, interviews, etc, have introduced me to performers I was not yet aware of.
Not really!
I still listen to LPs that have one too many pops & clicks 'cuz I like the music on it very much & I'm willing to put up with the disturbance.
What audiophilia has done to me is that it has exposed me to more genres of music such as Jazz & Blues. I used to be a classic & soft rock kinda guy.
Audiophilia has also made me seek out my type of music that is well recorded rather than mass-recorded so I end up paying more per CD or per LP rather being satisfied with CDs from, say, Sam Goody or the BMG club. This, I think, is the "curse" of hi-end!
Its a resounding hell yes in my court . I have the same tastes as Matchstickman in that I was raised on progressive rock. Rush , Yes ELP', ZEP were always spinning as I grew up.When I became serious about the playback chain and my systems became better, rock recordings sounded worse. This concept has been covered numerous times here so I will be brief but its simple really: a high resolution playback system can not be fully realized by poor recordings. Also your appreciation of new forms of recorded music will evolve and expand as you learn to like what you are using to exact the performance of your system. I listen to my rock favorites in my car primarily now and have started liking other bizarre forms of music I would not have given the time of day to in the past . It has exposed me to so many new artists and genres and that growth has been a treasure to me. I continue to learn and be opened minded as that attitude helps me grow which in turn makes life more of a challenge . The clock is ticking and I cant wait to wake up . The minute you think you know it all is the minute you begin hearing the clock.
I started off listening to my parent's LP's around 1967 or 68. They had a collection of classical, folk, and a few other things that don't twig the mind at the moment. Graduated to top 40 AM. Then in high school I went the prog rock route of some my fellow goners of the same age group. Back in the mid 70's most everybody listened to much the same thing at school. After high school I got my first decent (in retrospect it wasn't as good as I thought at the time) stereo. I was mired in prog rock, hard rock, and skinny tie music. I had one or two classical LP's almost as token representation. Zoom ahead twenty years and now at the age of 43 I still have some of the above excepting top 40, but lots of classical, blues, jazz, punk, heavy metal - really heavy, nu-metal, soft rock -if not too sleepy or whiny. So what does this mean? I've found that having a decent rig gets me listening to more music period! Now that I'm listening to more music I find I want more variety and am willing to give a listen to things I once would have dismissed arbitrarily. I wouldn't have changed this for anything in the world. I can be listening to the Melvins for one disc and then switch to say Mahler the next without blinking an eye and be quite moved by either. It isn't about the quality of the sound but the music itself and you would really believe this if you've ever heard a Melvin's recording. So if I'm listening to more music I can now justify spending more money on a better hi-fi. Of course this really becomes a chicken or egg kind of thing - do you start listening more then buy of buy then start listening more. I suspect a little of both. For me it was a matter of replacing a bunch of twenty odd year old equipment which had served me well with some new stuff for the next twenty years. I'm glad I did. Oh yes, Hell Yes.