@mbmi i totally understand. My speaker is a 14k speaker and my amp and dac are way more expensive in cost together but my system has great synergy. I built my system based on synergy and design elements.
High End System Building. How important is the matching, cabling and room? Thoughts ?
The last 20 years as an audiophile and now a dealer has taught me a very important lesson. Everything matters. The equipment can be great but no matter how much you spend the matching is very important. The cabling is also important. Some think cabling is all about making it sound better. I prefer my cabling to not get in the way. It’s like it can’t be a clogged faucet for your sound. Materials and shielding are very important. In addition to that the room is very important. You may not have a perfect room but you build your system to work in the room you have. I don’t have all the answers but you can’t just spend money and have a great system. Combination of equipment, cabling and room has gotten me there. I’ve tried a lot of gear and cables and this is how I feel. What are your thoughts everyone?
- ...
- 192 posts total
@mahgister , I am not arguing with what you have typed above. I may well be the only one on this thread (and one of the only few on this site) who freely admits he is not knowlegeable. And I also believe that if I had my system in a properly treated room it would sound better than it does now. But I also know that in two untreated (probably acoustically unfriendly) rooms, I have made equipment changes and auditions that changed the SQ. I also know that I have read posts from people who believe that they are knowlegeable that state (often unequivocally) that: if you cannot measure it you cannot hear it the room is EVERYTHING and next to the room the speaker is EVERYTHING good speakers make crappy electronics shine and good electronics do nothing for crappy speakers everything except for room and speakers is snake oil anyone who believes anything other than all of the above is a victim of confirmation bias. And I simply refer to those as being one or more school(s) of thought and I happen to subscribe to different schools of thought. Not that I wouldn't like better speakers and a better room. But I have heard very afforable speakers on electronics that were their match and electronics that were way above their level. I have experienced what an upgrade to those speakers sounded like. Then I experienced what upgrades and auditions of potential upgrades did for the new speakers. And all in untreated rooms. So I do not buy that the room is EVERYTHING.
|
I never say that the room is eveything if you read my post... I said acoustic is the prime factors which is a fact ...I add that no acoustic will compensate for a bad gear design too ... All matter even cables... But there exist and order of priorities: Synergy between gear... And pieces of gear cannot be compensated by acoustic... A bad amplifier will stay bad in a good room ... The most important transformation once the system is synergetical and relatively good and chosen by the owner will be ACOUSTICS ... Not an upgrade or a change in cable ...
I ONLY want to be understood ...
|
Again, @mahgister , I did not attribute all or any of those schools of thought to anyone in particular, least of all to you. However, I am saying that here on this site and also on Audio Asylum I have read posts that endorse all of those schools of thought, And almost all (if not all) of those people believe that they are knowlegeable. |
@mbmi , I also believe that the electronics in front of the speakers makes a difference. By almost every post I have read, over the years I wound up allocating my electronics to speaker ratio funds totally backwards. |
- 192 posts total