I have been using Rick Shultz's cables since they were Virtual Dynamics, and even still have a 'magnetic'/Everclear VD power cable with the technology used in the High Fidelity cables.
Each time I've upgraded I always hear 'more'. More music, more emotion, more detail. I've gone from Everclear to CT-1, to CT-1E, to CT-1 Ultimate, with power cables, ICs, and speaker cables. Each addition brought more music.
However, I finally got a power distributor, the MC-6, along with two of the MC0.5. I only installed the MC-6, with my TT power supply, the preamp, and disc player into it, but even though I should no longer be surprised by the increase in music when adding the magnetic cables, I was, again.
Amazing. Congratulations, Rick!
I'll add the MC0.5s next week.
On a side note, there is a repost in a big magazine website of a review of Lindsey-Geyer cables from the early 1990's, where they used conductors similar to what HF is using, but without the applied magnetism. Lot's of cool background info on skin effect depth, etc., that might explain why HF cables sound so good (to me).
Each time I've upgraded I always hear 'more'. More music, more emotion, more detail. I've gone from Everclear to CT-1, to CT-1E, to CT-1 Ultimate, with power cables, ICs, and speaker cables. Each addition brought more music.
However, I finally got a power distributor, the MC-6, along with two of the MC0.5. I only installed the MC-6, with my TT power supply, the preamp, and disc player into it, but even though I should no longer be surprised by the increase in music when adding the magnetic cables, I was, again.
Amazing. Congratulations, Rick!
I'll add the MC0.5s next week.
On a side note, there is a repost in a big magazine website of a review of Lindsey-Geyer cables from the early 1990's, where they used conductors similar to what HF is using, but without the applied magnetism. Lot's of cool background info on skin effect depth, etc., that might explain why HF cables sound so good (to me).