Importance of clocking


There is a lot of talk that external clocks because of the distance to the processor don‘t work. This is the opposite of my experience. While I had used an external Antelope rubidium clock,on my Etherregen and Zodiac Platinum Dac, I have now added a Lhy Audio UIP clocked by the same Antelope Clock to reclock the USB stream emanating from the InnuOS Zenith MkIII. The resultant increase in soundstage depth, attack an decay and overall transparency isn‘t subtle. While there seems to be lots of focus on cables, accurate clocking throughout the chain seems still deemed unnecessary. I don‘t understand InnuOS‘ selling separate reclockers for USB and Ethernet without synchronising Ethernet input, DAC conversion and USB output.

antigrunge2

Network switches used to improve sound quality (rather than just giving extra ports as originally intended) do so by massively reducing the amount of RFI reaching the streamer. I guess it will also filter out other traffic in the process, but it’s the RFI from other connected devices rather than some sort of digital crosstalk.

An unmanaged switch will do just as good a job of filtering RFI as a managed one, as the management bit is nothing to do with RFI.

@antigrunge2 You said "I don‘t understand InnuOS‘ selling separate reclockers for USB and Ethernet without synchronising Ethernet input, DAC conversion and USB output."

The PhoenixNet operates purely in the ethernet domain to kill RFI noise, it is not there to improve signal timing accuracy so decribing it as a reclocker isn't really accurate (this implies the improvement in sound quality which PhoenixNet users report is down to more accurate clocking and it's not).

You can't synchronise asynchronous (ethernet) and synchronous (DAC); it doesn't make sense.

@nigeltheflash 

I stand by what I hear and am not impressed: why would InnuOS include an expensive Ocxo clock if it has no benefit? And reclocking the Etherregen is very audible. so what is your equipment and reference base for making all your statements?

@antigrunge2 

Well, some reviews claim "The Innuos PhoenixNET will also improve your music playback from the files on the music server itself. Even though that music isn’t being streamed through the PhoenixNET. You heard that right."

Well.... something not even connected somehow improves the sound. OK.

Some digging around revealed that, for example, Ethernet does not do error correction. it does discard corrupt frames though. and TCP will retransmit lost packets. So the switch may be simply buffering frames and then transmitting in sequence on cable with fewer dropped packets. How does it affect the sound? Depends on quality of the streamer. 

@nigeltheflash - Do you mean RFI on the twisted pair or in the space around the unit? Simple shielding or or galvanic isolation would drastically reduce RFI. Not sure about necessity of switch for that purpose since it runs its own CPU and hence makes its own RFI. 

@antigrunge2 Re Innuos, you’d have to ask them but I suggest you first carefully read what they say on their website about the contribution of the clock to the performance of the PhoenixNET. I suspect it’s economies of scale: they needed a clock of some sort (all switches do) and they already have one which they know is both accurate and quiet. Why source a cheaper clock which may also be noisier in RFI terms?

You asked about my equipment. I use Cat 6A shielded cable into a Reiki Audio SuperSwitch into Innuos Pulse Mini with a Zen Mini MkIII power supply which has been moderately pimped to improve its performance. I have used a short (0.5m) Cat 6 unshielded from Pulse to dCS Puccini DAC (with external U-Clock) but am enjoying other short cables here so will swap the Cat 6 out.