Properly set up electrostatics throw a huge sound field. There's no reason at all you should be forced to supplement them with an extra speaker.
The advice is still solid, but you should need less of it to the sides and above/below. Behind however, where you are complaining about, that can be a real mess, especially if they are close to the rear walls.
I'd talk to GIK still, they may recommend diffusers as a better alternative than absorption.
In terms of speaker placement, the further away from the rear walls the better you'll be.
If you want to know how good those speakers can image, put them 2' in front of your chair. :) The difference between that and what you are hearing now is room acoustics.
One last thing, while ML's are known for fantastic imaging, and mid-range transparency what they usually are not is smooth across the frequency spectrum. After assessing placement and room acoustics I'd consider some sort of EQ solution. Either from a receiver with it built in, or an after market solution from miniDSP.
Best,
Erik
The advice is still solid, but you should need less of it to the sides and above/below. Behind however, where you are complaining about, that can be a real mess, especially if they are close to the rear walls.
I'd talk to GIK still, they may recommend diffusers as a better alternative than absorption.
In terms of speaker placement, the further away from the rear walls the better you'll be.
If you want to know how good those speakers can image, put them 2' in front of your chair. :) The difference between that and what you are hearing now is room acoustics.
One last thing, while ML's are known for fantastic imaging, and mid-range transparency what they usually are not is smooth across the frequency spectrum. After assessing placement and room acoustics I'd consider some sort of EQ solution. Either from a receiver with it built in, or an after market solution from miniDSP.
Best,
Erik