@mijostyn:
"It is not an issue to argue about, like art there are an infinite number of ways to interpret it"
Well, I'd disagree just a bit. My BA is in studio art and in school, I became quite used to evaluating artwork in terms of how skillfully it accomplished what the artist set out to do-- both in terms of form and content. This is the "craft" aspect and I'd argue this is not strictly an "interpretive" process.
Taking this approach pre-supposes a capacity for setting aside one's initial, spontaneous response, which can be very challenging but it's like a muscle that gets stronger through practice.
Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting that if an artwork is successful in this "craft" aspect, you or I or any given individual will automatically like it!
However, if we solely go by our personal taste, we may fail to appreciate much in the world of art.
"It is not an issue to argue about, like art there are an infinite number of ways to interpret it"
Well, I'd disagree just a bit. My BA is in studio art and in school, I became quite used to evaluating artwork in terms of how skillfully it accomplished what the artist set out to do-- both in terms of form and content. This is the "craft" aspect and I'd argue this is not strictly an "interpretive" process.
Taking this approach pre-supposes a capacity for setting aside one's initial, spontaneous response, which can be very challenging but it's like a muscle that gets stronger through practice.
Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting that if an artwork is successful in this "craft" aspect, you or I or any given individual will automatically like it!
However, if we solely go by our personal taste, we may fail to appreciate much in the world of art.