I am trying to draw conclusions from AS two statements:
"No active line stage, no matter how good it is, will ever equal the sonics of your direct connection (or an equivalent passive)."
"He now believes for the vast majority(with rare exception) a superior active is preferred."
Perhaps if you are the rare exception (me?) no active line stage can beat a passive -- the very same thing Roger Modjeski told me, though he did not think it was all that "rare" that a passive preamp would be the volume control of choice. Which does not mean I'm not going to get another active tube line stage to switch with my Lightspeed Attenuator from time to time.
"No active line stage, no matter how good it is, will ever equal the sonics of your direct connection (or an equivalent passive)."
"He now believes for the vast majority(with rare exception) a superior active is preferred."
Perhaps if you are the rare exception (me?) no active line stage can beat a passive -- the very same thing Roger Modjeski told me, though he did not think it was all that "rare" that a passive preamp would be the volume control of choice. Which does not mean I'm not going to get another active tube line stage to switch with my Lightspeed Attenuator from time to time.