Is soundstaging emblematic of reality?


Now that finally I have a system that soundstages excellently, I’m wondering if it’s actually  a vital component of a real concert experience.  In most genres of music, unless you’re sitting very close to the action, you don’t get the kind of precise imaging revealed in a good stereo setup.  That’s because microphones are usually (with some rare exceptions) placed close up. If you’re sitting in the middle to back section of an audience (which most people do) you certainly don’t hear anything close to holographic imaging, or even what most people accept as satisfactory imaging. 
Granted, it’s loads of fun to hear this soundstaging. And I certainly love it.  Some people might consider it the ideal music experience. But is it an essential component of musical enjoyment?


128x128rvpiano
What is the alternative to having soundstaging ? Would you prefer that all instruments come from the same space ? All diffuse and unrecognizable . Don't get why you wouldn't want every instrument separated . 
One could probably argue that a system which gets the soundstage right gets time coherence right. That should be important for micro detail and 'texture' - like the body of an instrument or vocalist.
Ime, these features are linked.
I heard the best soundstage ever yesterday. Nothing comes close. Customer No. 1 in Arlington. Whoa, Daddy! It’s a freak out! Get the soundstage right and the rest will follow. And guess what? It’s digital. 😬
Maplegrovemusic,

You bring up a good point. 
I just think imaging should not be over valued as the end-all of music production.
Many other tonal  factors enter into it.  
Also, some of us get hung up with the pursuit of imaging and forget that the music is the real object.

 
Rvpiano
+1, Soundstaging and imaging insure that the musicians are in the room.  Expression and interplay insure they are interesting.