George as I have shared with you in the past I respect you and your passion. While I do think you can be tad narrow in your view of other ways to attain fidelity, I nevertheless enjoy your helping spirit and enthusiasm.
I would love Mr. Pass to share with us if he thinks his expensive and wonderful active line stages sound better to him compared to a passive like the LSA. Would he say your passive is as good or better sounding? Forget features, as I am just talking about sound quality and how live and real it sounds. I think he would say his best actives sound more like the real thing if asked this direct question. Love to hear his comment on this one comparison question.
I know there is technically no need for an active as passives like yours can sound good indeed. Seems the very best attempts at SOTA music within a stereo system often times involve great actives...not always.
What about the recording engineers of the world? Should they be eliminating gain stages? Fact is eliminating these gain stages does impact dynamics. High frequencies compress all together so you can hear everything at the same level. The background noise is just as loud as the voice etc...This is just an example of properly executed gain stages and their importance.
My experience is not one proving my tube active colors the sound to my taste. You have said this often, but that is simply not the case George. For me, and based on my experience with with TRL Dude compared to the LSA, color had little to do with it.
The dynamic impact of whole performance and individual part becomes more live and real sounding with the Dude. The relative volume, layering, placement, impact, of each instrument to the other on the stage are captured with greater fidelity with the Dude. These are not subjective color preferences, rather they are the nuances that make a stereo system sound like real, live music.
I don't point this out to somehow prove my active is better than the LSA for all, but in an effort to have a broader discourse on the different roads to fidelity to the music. No absolutes and an open mind on other possibilities.
I would love Mr. Pass to share with us if he thinks his expensive and wonderful active line stages sound better to him compared to a passive like the LSA. Would he say your passive is as good or better sounding? Forget features, as I am just talking about sound quality and how live and real it sounds. I think he would say his best actives sound more like the real thing if asked this direct question. Love to hear his comment on this one comparison question.
I know there is technically no need for an active as passives like yours can sound good indeed. Seems the very best attempts at SOTA music within a stereo system often times involve great actives...not always.
What about the recording engineers of the world? Should they be eliminating gain stages? Fact is eliminating these gain stages does impact dynamics. High frequencies compress all together so you can hear everything at the same level. The background noise is just as loud as the voice etc...This is just an example of properly executed gain stages and their importance.
My experience is not one proving my tube active colors the sound to my taste. You have said this often, but that is simply not the case George. For me, and based on my experience with with TRL Dude compared to the LSA, color had little to do with it.
The dynamic impact of whole performance and individual part becomes more live and real sounding with the Dude. The relative volume, layering, placement, impact, of each instrument to the other on the stage are captured with greater fidelity with the Dude. These are not subjective color preferences, rather they are the nuances that make a stereo system sound like real, live music.
I don't point this out to somehow prove my active is better than the LSA for all, but in an effort to have a broader discourse on the different roads to fidelity to the music. No absolutes and an open mind on other possibilities.