I can’t comment, because I have no scientific knowledge of 33 cycles having such an impact. As for the religious suggestion, that’s just plain silly. Trusting any of the gospels to provide accurate dating, given how much later they were recorded/edited; that there are dozens of gnostic and many other gospels the church deemed pseudoepigraphical makes recovering the historical Jesus very doubtful despite the persistent work of scholars. It is right up there with Bible code worshippers. So 33 years of age is unlikely to be accurate. What is true is that the ancients loved numbers to match their theories, and so changed the numbers rather than their theories. Ancient calendars claimed the year was 360 days long so that each quarter would be a whole number. Oops. Jesus being a third of a hundred may relate to that tendency to make the world tidier than it is.
Having been inside the great pyramid, I don’t remember any obvious 33 Hz resonance. But everything vibrates at some frequency. A quick websearch shows many resonant frequencies for the great pyramids, but none were 33 that I saw. But the fact that different frequencies have been recorded also makes this claim suspect.
As for 33 cycles being the ONLY frequency to remove a digital fingerprint—has the OP tested every single other frequency, including non-wholes? Finally, our measurement of cycles is based on a human made time schema, not something hard baked into the universe. That doesn’t eliminate the possibility Of 33, just highlights a random, unnecessary feature of it.
To my ear, the first recording sounded better, btw
Having been inside the great pyramid, I don’t remember any obvious 33 Hz resonance. But everything vibrates at some frequency. A quick websearch shows many resonant frequencies for the great pyramids, but none were 33 that I saw. But the fact that different frequencies have been recorded also makes this claim suspect.
As for 33 cycles being the ONLY frequency to remove a digital fingerprint—has the OP tested every single other frequency, including non-wholes? Finally, our measurement of cycles is based on a human made time schema, not something hard baked into the universe. That doesn’t eliminate the possibility Of 33, just highlights a random, unnecessary feature of it.
To my ear, the first recording sounded better, btw