Mapleshade Silclear


Category: Accessories

I'm not a big proponent of the "WOW" factor, meaning very few tweaks have caused me to go "WOW". The wow ones include rebuilding my McCormack DNA .5 amp to near Rev A, changing the caps in my speakers from Axon's to Sonicaps, and few others. Now that doesn't mean I don't hear differences and improvements with other tweaks, it's just that I don't believe in overemphasizing these differences into religous revalations and such.

So, Silclear doesn't fall into the "WOW" category with me, but it did make an improvement in my rig. The simplest explanation of these changes I can make goes like this. Have you ever cleaned the contacts on your interconnects, speaker cables and power cords after a year or more of ignoring them? Did you hear the improvements in transparency and quieter backgrounds? Well I just cleaned everything over the New Year's holidays with cotton balls and alcohol with an application of SST (to signal wires) and Pro-Gold (to electrical connections) afterwards. Now, in February I applied Silclear to everything in my system that has a plug, jack or socket. This means interconnects, speaker cables, fuses, all electrical jacks inside my amp & CD player and DAC, electrical cords, tube pins, phono cartridge pins, etc. The difference was as if I left all these connections to tarnish for a year or more and then cleaned them all again.

Now, given that I just did the cleaning I can conclude that Silclear took this one step farther than alcohol and SST. Things were more transparent and noticeably punchier. The bass was louder (dammit - I had to turn down the sub's volume and rebalance the bottom end again). Soundstaging and imaging seemed to be a slight/tiny bit more forward than before, maybe because things seemed a bit louder at the same volume settings. Tonally everything was still balanced, just more there in terms of detail and nuance and definition. But I also found that there was a sense of more "realness" to instruments, especially cymbals (hearing more brass with the zing), and voice (more in the room presence), and piano (more body and weight). The system sounded quieter too - i.e. blacker backgrounds (but this can also vary by time of day as the power grid changes).

Is this a "wow" review in disguise? Perhaps for many it is, but I already have a whole lot of transparency and realness in my system (see "Isn't Anything Stock?" for my system details). I now have more of that than before.

I really can't report that there were any bad aftereffects of the Silclear either. There's no way to undo the application easily (it's a grease), so there's no A-B testing available. So many tweaks improve on thing at the expense of another - not here. It's a good thing (thank you Martha Stewart, now go directly to jail and don't pass "GO").

Enjoy,
Bob
ptmconsulting

Showing 8 responses by gammajo

I put Silclear very sparing to get the thinnest coating possible on my ss sytem yesterday. It was my first real tweak experiment except applying "Tweek" itself over a decade ago. "Tweek" did not impress me. However Silclear provided me a definte Wow last night.
SilClear was no placebo effect. The music is more present, with hearing of previously impercievable instrumentation in the backround of well known favorites.
I will report if I get the muddiness mentioned here. Sure hope not. I bet it is a real b... to take off.
Well its good news and bad. I am very happy to hear that other careful listeners noticed so much improvement in thier systems also. Yet I now too await the degradation.Perhaps I will get lucky in that I did fairly carefully clean my connections before applying and used a thin coat.
The product recommends putting SilClear only on the male part of connections, so I can see how to clear that off. But of course once the connection is joined the Silclear is now on the female part as well. Do any of you with experience have suggestions on how to clean the now contaminated interior female parts? Sorry this post is so pornographic.
I talked to Pierre at MapleShade today. At the risk of being inaccurate, he feels that SilClear can never become an insulator, as suggested earlier in this thread. The only explanation he had for degradation would be that the product was put on too thickly at the beginning and then migrated with heat over time to cause a short within the system. BTW he was very nice and very interested in people's experience with the product. Hope this helps
Joe
Nonoise and anyone else who would like to comment. I am going to clean off my Silclear from anywhere it might migrate causing shorts becuase I think that I am hearing a degradation and am awaiting new speakers and want all to be cherry.
I started using kerosine as recommended by MapleShade and the Silclear comes of easily. The Deoxit people say that their product will not cut through grease. I am then using deoxit after the kerosene cleaning.
My question is how are you cleaning the RCA plugs, both the male and the female parts. I have sprayed deoxit into the female part, and used fine point swabs on the male. Is there a better way. It is very tedious. Thanks
NoNoise
Thanks. Not panicking but wanting everything right for my new speakers. K1 Kerosin does work well to remove.
"I thought I had detail and info aplenty but now its a different story." Not sure if you mean it was better with the Silclear or after it was removed.
I had the same experience except over a a period of about two months. Was wondering if my ears were tricking me, so thank you for sharing your experience. My guess is that I applied it more thickly or my SS amp generated more heat.