http://www1.audioquest.com/resource_tools/downloads/literature/learning_modules/Understanding-BiWiri...
B4icu, by the way, as instated previously, you don’t seem to know what bi wiring actually is.
Audioquest checks in on the dodgy subject of bi wiring, http://www1.audioquest.com/resource_tools/downloads/literature/learning_modules/Understanding-BiWiri... B4icu, by the way, as instated previously, you don’t seem to know what bi wiring actually is. |
Mr. geoffkait
Did you notice that the bottom of your ref. was written or approved
by AudioQuest that is a cable maker? Do I need to explain you why Bi-wires
are better for AudioQuest than a single wire? (I'll give you a clue: they
make double the money on bi-wire). Your lovely description of bi wire could be also applied to a chair or a table. It would work the same. |
Yes, exactly! Audioquest is a cable maker. And you are not. Polk is a speaker maker and you are not. Definitive Technology is a speaker maker and you are not. See the pattern? Furthermore, there is no financial advantage for a speaker company or an audiophile magazine editor to promote bi wiring. Hey-loo! |
Bringing this back to topic, b4icu, did you say that this doesn't work on class D amplifiers? If so, does that also go for class T as well? And what about for budget receivers and speakers, for example, I have this amp: https://www.cnet.com/products/sony-str-dh820/specs/ and B&W 684 speakers. What would the optimal cable be for that pairing, and, in your opinion, would it be worth it? As for bi-wiring, I'm going to test my current cable in a bi wire set up. If that offers an improvement over single wire with a solid silver jumper cable then I'll compare that against the 0 awg when it arrives. If that sounds better again, I might even bi wire the 0 awg. If it works, great. If it doesn't I can use it in another system. |