What are the differencesEnormous....
between programmed computers and programmed people?
Infinite difference to say it clearly...
Machine cannot choose to be programmed by this or those person, they could never either choose the program content...A man choose the programmer and the program content , if he cannot choose his country or his family he can also reprogram himself or chose an other "father" or an other "language"...
We can "program" ourself or saying it in a better way, we may reorient our attention and consciousness to perceive WHOLE and INTERNAL TOTALITY not only external one and external parts...
This is the "natural" pathway.....Goethe call the perception of the whole : Truth or Beauty...Or Nature...
Goethe would have never fall for the transhumanist tactic to erase nature or to blur the distinction between artificial and natural....What we see behind the world actual crisis if you pay attention....
Can all
statements be put in ’’ s is P’’ (subject IS predicate) sentence
form?
It depend of what you call a statement precisely ... your definition of statement mimic a procustean bed...And procustean method is a bad joke for sure not a method....but you already know that no?
But language is deeper than proposition statement or logical calculus...Language convey and express multidimensional human experiences...
Read about metaphors....You will learn that you have never understood what a metaphor is ever...It is normal, metaphor processing reflect the deeper mechanism of the mind... ALL LANGUAGE IS METAPHORICAL STRATA...Not propositional strata at all, save at the mere surface...
Read about creative imagination and perception...
I will propose an exercise for you:
Read about the limit and power of language in apophatic and cataphatic Theology East and west , after that think about the deep Cantorian analogy between the idea of set and the way it relate to Spiritual Theology for example, if you want to practice language power of expression and limitations....
And if you think all i just said is superficial read what Kurt Goedel has to say about it....And say to him if you dare that he is a bad reader of Frege and Quine....😁
You can also practice the "yoga" of attention by reading the Goethe treatise about plant...
I will let you choose what stir your pot the best, numbers, geometry or living organism...
You could also pick acoustic and think how to figure out for yourself how the sound "lives" in your own particular room....Experiencing then not dead equations through a computer but miraculous physico-psychical phenomena... Not S is P but living metaphor call "music"....
In all these contemplation proposition S is P is useless...
I recommend to make the matter straight the 2 greatest books about mathematical creativity and spiritual experience ever written :
Alexander Grothendieck : "The key of dreams" and "Harvests and sowings", 2,000 pages long... No trace of Frege here or Quine... 😁i read them...
I suppose that you know already that Grothendieck is a genius only in the same league of the like of Poincaré and Ramanujan.... Not many other one...
But these books exist only in french it is the catch....😁😊