On ''what there is''

The Germans have the most philosopher in the world with
possible exception of the ''old Greek''. What is however very
strange is their opinion about them: ''there is nothing more
easy than to refute an philosopher . The only thing one need
to do is to tread some other''. 

Philosophy is the love of thought. A philosopher enjoys exercising the intellect. It is fun, but even children’s games have rules. Even children lose patience and get upset when you try and break the rules. Don’t say deed for did, they are two completely different things.

A deed is an act. Deed is present tense. Did is past tense. The deed is done. He did it.

Grammar is the way we structure our language. Since we have no way of communicating what we think other than with words it is essential we follow the rules of grammar. Otherwise, if we don’t follow the rules we risk writing gibberish no one can even begin to understand.

How many ’’issues’’ can’t be expressed with such
poor base with only 3 words grammar ?

See what I mean?

The Germans have the most philosopher in the world with
possible exception of the ’’old Greek’’. What is however very
strange is their opinion about them: ’’there is nothing more
easy than to refute an philosopher . The only thing one need
to do is to tread some other’’.

Like the history of music, or of any art, or any histories of any other cultural activies which deevelop his own temporal scale, history of philosophy mirror the history of consciousness...

In this consciousness collective history, each philosopher is indispensable and necessary to consider if we want to understand the scopes and perspectives present in each era...

Then the main point is not a futile and sometimes childish refutation of each philosopher but the crucial understanding of his role and place in this history of consciousness.... What illustrate and reveal about human consciousness this philosopher perspective in all history....



Embedding any philosopher in the multidimensional history of philosophy and consciousness is analogous of the way we must embed any audio specific pieces of gear in their 3 working dimensions...

i cannot resist to make this analogy.... 😁😊

Grammar is the way we structure our language.

I lived through 2 intellectual and almost spiritual ectasy in my life...

The discovery of the distribution of prime numbers...But this is another story...

And the deep meaning behind ANY "apparently arbitrary" rule of grammar...

People who think that grammar of any language is arbitrary are deluded or ignorant of linguistic...Grammars mirror completely the neuro activity of our brain in a different mode of expression in each culture...

i cannot vouch too much for Gustave Guillaume psychomechanic of language and discourse.... Alas! only in french....


Grammar is boring if we stay at his surface level, in his deep internal mechanism it is like a LSD trip in a higher mathematic....

It takes a genius to guide us.... Guillaume is certainly one in more than 40 books.... If you read french try it....




For me there is 2 levels in language dynamic genesis:

The deep motivation of sound-speech on one unconscious level on a long time scale in relation with words construction and formation and the " feeling" aspect of human constitution ..

And a corresponding relative demotivation of the sound speech which correspond to what we describe generally as sentence "grammar" in a more conscious level corresponding to the " thinking" aspect of human constitution...

The 2 opposite mechanisms work together on 2 levels...This idea is mine, not strictly in Guillaume like i expose it here... But it gives the flavor of my reflection...

These 2 levels could be resumed in a simplest way if you remark that they match and correspond to poetic mode working and the prosaic mode working of language....

Now for the REASON to be REASON these 2 working mode are necessary if not, human degenerate into irrational animal or so called "rational" machine....

 Then to be "human" is being able to create and accomodate together all derivative modes of these 2 archetypal symbolic matrix and modes : the poetic and the prosaic in language...

millecarbon, ''deed'' and ''did'' explain your problem . Ever heard
about ''brain drain'' from Europe to USA. Many Germans become
university professors in America. Lew told us to have had German professor who give them lessons about Kant. Then think of
Enstein, Goedel, Tarski , Carnap , etc,etc. Neither of them speak
English as ''first language'' nor with ''perfect grammar''. They
were obviously not invited to America because of their English.
What then for? I got not only ''did'' as correction of my ''deed''
but also remark : ''English is not your first language''. My answer
was that English is my 4th language. I have not seen reaction
of this member in this context. Well speaking about ''context'' .
There is the meaning of words to find. Not in isolation like ''did''
and ''deed''. The so called ''generative power of language'' is not
in grammar but in ''free combinations of morpheme'' by which
new words are ''composed'' with new meaning. You are only
demonstrating your lack of knowledge of which you are, uh,
not conscious . So, it seems, this ''entity'' consciousness does
''exist'' . Aka is ''there''.