Actually from most accounts the pre-RCA Cunningham 345 is the tube to have. Predates when RCA bought Cunningham... will have engraved base, 345 as the number, C logo on top of tubes. Ijust got a pair of these and they are sweet. But! the EML easily betters them in all regards (except looks). I have a pair of SOlid plate EML 45s (meshies on the way), and the sound is as detailed, more extended and just about as smooth as the NOS ones. I was lucky to find a nice NOS matched pair of 345s... they are not too easy to come by. (talking globes here, not ST shape). Not surprising since they are probably 70+ years old... amazing they exist at all. But, yes - if I was to sell them the price would be at least $250/pr. (guaranteed though). Still, I'd say take that money and put it towards the EML 45 (solid plate)... well worth the extra $ I think. www.emissionlabs.com This EML 45 is the single only case in my experience where new production has clearly bettered the NOS version of the same tube. In every other situation, old-stock is the winner. Wish there were more tubes like the EML 45 where they were not only better but also easily available/guaranteed/matched/etc.!
-Ed
-Ed