Mdelrossi1, thanks for your input. I would add, though, that the 1008be2 has a specified minimum impedance of 3.9 ohms, while the OP’s 948 has a specified minimum impedance of only 2.5 ohms. And based on Stereophile’s measurements of the 936, which is more similar to the 948 than your speakers, the 948’s impedance probably stays in the vicinity of 3 ohms pretty much throughout the mid-bass region, where lots of energy is typically required. The interaction of an impedance that low with a high amplifier output impedance will weaken the bass, while the speaker’s impedance rise to much higher values in the lower treble region will add brightness, in combination with a high amplifier output impedance.
Also, since I hadn’t been able to find output impedance measurements of the non-HP version of the integrated amp I wasn’t saying that the non-HP would definitely be a poor match to the 948. Rather, I was saying that the HP version should be a reasonable match, based on the measurements I cited, while statements and measurements in reviews such as the one I cited of the non-HP DiaLogue Premium power amp suggest that pairing the non-HP integrated amp with the 948 would incur a major risk of poor results.
Regards,
-- Al
Also, since I hadn’t been able to find output impedance measurements of the non-HP version of the integrated amp I wasn’t saying that the non-HP would definitely be a poor match to the 948. Rather, I was saying that the HP version should be a reasonable match, based on the measurements I cited, while statements and measurements in reviews such as the one I cited of the non-HP DiaLogue Premium power amp suggest that pairing the non-HP integrated amp with the 948 would incur a major risk of poor results.
Regards,
-- Al