Radikal Linn LP12 or Palmer 2.5?
- ...
- 45 posts total
This is an old thread, and I fully acknowledge that..But in the event someone stumbles into the opinion above, please do your homework...Sound of anything we discuss here is subjective and individual to the listeners ears. But to say that a fiddlly Linn LP12 is in the same league as the Palmer is laughable...On looks alone the opnion here is toast. Both are two radically different designs, two difference categories of TTs. Most shopping for a Linn aren't shopping for a high mass table..The bias in this opinion is almost laughable...Feickert yes I will give the nod to those tables as a viable competitor, Linn, not so much. It's a sprung table with marketing scheme behind it for upgrades. Basically it's a giant hole in the ground you throw money into..I know they have their following, and to each their own...A Palmer however should NOT be compared to an LP12. There is no comparison. |
@jc51373 Now that I own a Linn LP12 Klimax spec model, and having heard a lot of tables since this thread started, all I can say to your post is YMMV. I had the choice of buying a Palmer, a Technics 1000, a Dr Feickert and even a TechDas V Premium ( at considerably more $$). I own the Linn, if that says anything. |
I have a Lp12 Kore Cirkus Lingo 3 with Ekos 1 sticky arm that sounds great. Dialed in the arm and rebuilt Troika cartridge with Soundtraktor, Rega scale and Analog Magik software. The table has stayed in tune for years and sounds great. The key to tune I found was making sure the spring screws are perpendicular to the plate. I adjust the springs while the table is on the jig upside down so I don't have to guess or feel that the springs are not twisted. Biggest change ever to the sound was actually replacing the Linn din cable with a used traded in Revelation Audio din cable I picked up from my dealer. Was not a subtle change. Suggest do not overlook this as upgrade path. Glad you are enjoying the LP12. |
- 45 posts total