Review: Musical Fidelity A3.2cr Preamplifier

I'm very satisfied with this pre-amp. Love it's dual mono design. Coupled with my Aragon dual mon power amp I get excellent separation. Agre with the non-fatigue factor as well. I know there are better pre-amps out there but one would be hard pressed to find one without spending much more money.Something I can't do at this time.

I own a MF A3Cr for 5 years. I'm now replacing it for a demo Audio Research Ref2MkII, which costs (new) 10 times more money. One has to spend a great amout of money to take a step forward replacing the A3cr preamp. Some models are more expensive but just different, not better. The AR gives you more focus on the soundstage, and a bigger dimension on the soundstage.
However, I'll miss my A3Cr and you're right. For the money its the better preamp I know. It beats some much more expensive models and is very reliable.

Dear Schuesmp,
I have owned the Mac C-46 and the Levinson No.380S, and I have auditioned (in my living room) the Levinson No.32 Reference, the VTL TL-7.5, the Ayre K-1x, and the 2 latest upgrades of the CAT. I have also auditioned the Musical Fidelity A3.2cr. I own the Musical Fidelity A308cr. I agree with you. The A3.2cr is as good as any of them, and a couple of the above are 5-figure outlays. You get bragging rights with them, but no better sound. I bought the A308cr instead of the A3.2cr because I got a demo-deal that made it too much of a bargain to pass up. It sounds identical to the A3.2cr but is capable of swinging a bit more voltage. I still own the VTL, in a different system in a second house. It is just as good, but no better. Plus, since it is a tube model, you have to baby it -- i.e., take care turning it off and on, warming it up, etc. You could hit ANY of the Musical Fidelity preamps with an axe, drop it on the freeway in front of a semi, pick it up, plug it in, and leave it on for the next ten years, and it would STILL work, probably sounding better for the burn-in. It is as transparent as any active preamp I have heard, favors NO part of the frequency spectrum, and can put out enough voltage, with no overload, to drive 200 feet of cable. It is dynamic as hell, probably because of its ability to swing so much voltage. The ONLY area in which some of the more expensive brands can "beat" the Musical Fidelity is flexibility: the Musical Fidelity has no balance control (which, to me, is a plus, because it takes about 3 grand off the price tag/quality ratio) and no second set of outputs. If you want transparency and reliability, and you need a balance control, better pull out that wallet and pony up the big bucks. I am glad you did this review because it exposes a silly (and expensive!) myth: brand-name prestige + high price + reviewer hyperpole + dream factor = greater quality. Your review is just as good as any I have read on this site. Happy tunes!
Gerald Clifton
gkcc3@netzero.com

The TriVista Integrated is truely special.

A year has passed since I wrote my review of the Musical Fidelity A3.2cr preamplifier. Wow, my review was crap compared to others on this site. Anyway, I sold it and purchased the MF Tri-Vista integrated. If money were no object, I'd purchase other gear for decorative purposes only. The MF is staying in my system.

These guys must like McIntosh, too. I did numerous shoot-outs with equipment of various brands until I landed on my Musical Fidelity A308cr amp and preamp, blowing away gear that cost WAY more with aplomb -- UNTIL, that is, I borrowed a new Tri-Vista from my hifi dealer... *sob* This thing is nothing short of amazing. That detailed, in-the-room-with-you MF presence, but with zero stridence in the top end, thanks to the Trivistor tubes. Aboslutely the closest I've gotten to fooling my ears into thinking they're witnessing the recorded event, not the playback of the recording. And orchestral levels are no problem with my Thiel 2.3's from Tri-Vista's 600Wpc/4 ohms.

I'd have to agree w/ KF. If price were no object, then you'd probably be listening to Mark Levinson or Plinius SS amps. Or, for an even more realistic and more enjoyable listening experience (IMHO), listen to some tube amps. I thought MF stuff was the greatest too for awhile until I heard some good tube gear (i.e. Cary). That said, MF is very good quality gear for the price.

I'd like to chime in here in support of Musical Fidelity preamps.

I replaced my VAC CLA-1 Mk II (tube) preamp with the Musical Fidelity A3cr (the predecessor to the A3.2cr) about a month ago. The VAC is a very strong preamp, but the Musical Fidelity gives me much more of what I want in my music: crisp, clean sound. Violins sound so much more lifelike. I can hear the rush of air from the saxophones. The brass instruments have much more impact and brilliance. My favorite music comes more alive with this preamp, and that's high praise considering the preamp it replaced is no slouch.

For the price, the A3cr is a phenomenal value. The build quality is excellent. Is it the absolute best available? Of course not. But for the price, the A3cr is an outstanding value. And that is one of the best recommendations I can offer for a product.

Michael

Schuesm, if money were no object, you'd own a better ss preamp than the MF A3.2cr pre. Put it next to an Ayre K-1x, Lamm preamp (forget their solid state models), or even an older Krell KRC HR (ofc all of these preamps retail/ed for some serious bucks), and I am sure you'd forget about this MF preamp really fast, heh heh... However, at the price point of the MF A3.2cr, it is probably pretty good (just estimating from other MF products I have heard, MF amps and preamp).

KF