@mitch2 I was thinking about separate runs (no bi wire) just to separate „+” run and „-„ run and lower interference of any kind between these two wires.
Do you think that noise cancelation from twisting wires is wort to run them very close one to each other?
Soeaker cables technologic dilema…

2. Second solution: two SEPARATE double-wire cables, one for + and one for -, but without shield.

The number of cores, core cross-section, material, weave, both in NES-3003-G and NES-3005-G everything is the same.
- ...
- 39 posts total
@mitch2 That was my thought, although I'd neglected to state such... Carry on, and thanx, J |
@milimetr - run them as a twisted pair or cross-connected quad - that is why they design them that way. |
BTW, since there was a mention elsewhere about the 'time stamps' on posts being weird.... *WTH?!* Hey, I'm admittedly old, perhaps ADD, ADHD, both, or subject to something due to an abhorrent lifestyle.....or A'gon has developed a really bad case of digital hiccups ( CD 'skips' comes to mind....I have one that does....Truth)... ...but I am paying attention...Really...*L* |
- 39 posts total