Soeaker cables technologic dilema…


We have two technological solutions when it comes to speaker cable: 
 
1. Four wires (2 on + and 2 on -), twisted in a star quad, in a screened braid and in one collective insulation.

2. Second solution: two SEPARATE double-wire cables, one for + and one for -, but without shield. 


The number of cores, core cross-section, material, weave, both in NES-3003-G and NES-3005-G everything is the same. 
 
In the first solution we have a screen, and in the second solution we have a separation of plus and minus. 
 
How will it be better? What to expect?
milimetr

@milimetr - run them as a twisted pair or cross-connected quad - that is why they design them that way.

BTW, since there was a mention elsewhere about the 'time stamps' on posts being weird....
I got 2 @mitch2's responses that repeated your above as a 'mention' 8x each, one with 2, and 2 labeled "Soeaker cables technologic dilema…" with 2 each as well....

*WTH?!*  Hey, I'm admittedly old, perhaps ADD, ADHD, both, or subject to something due to an abhorrent lifestyle.....or A'gon has developed a really bad case of digital hiccups ( CD 'skips' comes to mind....I have one that does....Truth)...

...but I am paying attention...Really...*L*

Solutions? Solutions to what? Increasing margins for snake oil companies? This cable won't be any better than a coat hanger. I guarantee you would never know the difference in a blind test.

@squared80 Well, there's no equipment listed in your profile so I guess we can only assume you speak from experience.

"Solutions? Solutions to what? Increasing margins for snake oil companies? This cable won't be any better than a coat hanger. I guarantee you would never know the difference in a blind test."

 

 

@milimetr 

We have two technological solutions when it comes to speaker cable

Your opening statement ignores the hundreds of speaker cable designs on the market.  If you want us to hypothetically compare just two designs from the one company, best say so!