Some tables have soul and some not

Inna, you obviously missed the the point of reference.
The religious 'arguments' are silly in the context. Ie the
religious statements have no truth values. For the truth value one need the sense as well as the reference of the used names. Otherwise we may also discuss the peculiarity of Pegasus or the unicorns.

Regards,

" The religious 'arguments' are silly in the context. Ie the religious statements have no truth values.

Thats the same thing hitler and stalin said.

Dear Rok2id, You have obviously never heard about phylosophy of science. The truth values are from logic.The logical schematics mark the places with variables which need to be filled in with names such that an sentence function can become a sentence with a sense. But the names must have a reference for the truth values. You mentioning of Hitler en Stalin in this context says more about you than about those persons or me. But to put this more clearly: religion has nothing to do with science.

Regards,

"religion has nothing to do with science."

God has a lot to do with Science. Unless you believe the universe and all it's laws just happened by chance.

A word of advice, get you a good english dictionary, I think some of your points are being lost. At lest I have trouble following your line of thought.

Dear Rok2id, Your trouble to follow my thoughts are not caused by my English but by your education. You have no idea what you are talking about. BTW what is the reference of your word 'God'?