glubson,''nice story but how is it related to Soundsmth story?''
My first post dispute the ''believing'' part of the story.
Believing in Peter's capability, integrity, ect. is not the same as
believing in Soundsmith as company. There was an French
king who stated: ''France that is I''. Besides Peter is not some
''collective being'' . He is as all of us an individual person not
by chance with his own name. Because he himself . stated to
have .''many employees'' there is, say chance, that someone
else retiped the cart. So ''Peter retiped my cart'' will not do.
The reason is simple: it is not true that Peter retiped my cart.
So if someone else deed it then one should use the quantifier
''some'' which is most easy to explain with: ''someone has stolen
my cart''. This is the same as I have no idea who retiped
my cart. Strange ''base'' for believiving. All the 'straw man''
constructions against me were actually based on assumption
that my intention was to hurt Peter. I used the other example,
Van den Hul with the same problem. When people state
''Van den Hul retiped my cart'' what are they referring to?
Van den Hul himself or his company? Companies are theso called
''legal bodies'' . Invented by lawyers in order to reduce risk for the
entrepreneurs.
By separating comapies assets from his private assets. Such that
only company assets would be liable for their debts, But company
is not able to act. Only humans can act. So each legal body has
representatives who act in the name of the company.
My point was that believes have nothing to do with the truth.
An statement is true or false irrespective from what we believe.
