Soundsmith having Issues because of COVID

@millercarbon   If you do go over to 'Whats Best Forum', make sure you don't bring up anything that might upset one of the all knowing, all seeing gurus over there! They are very one sided and there is no moderation.

glubson,''nice story but how is it related to Soundsmth story?''
My first post dispute the ''believing''  part of the story.
Believing in Peter's  capability, integrity, ect. is not the same as
believing  in Soundsmith as company. There was an  French
king who stated: ''France that is I''. Besides Peter is not some
''collective being'' . He is as all of us an individual person not
by chance with his own name. Because he himself . stated to
have .''many employees'' there is, say chance, that someone
else retiped the cart. So ''Peter retiped my cart'' will not do.
The reason is simple: it is not true that Peter retiped my cart.
So if someone else deed it then one should use the quantifier
''some'' which is most easy to explain with: ''someone has stolen
my cart''. This is the same as I have no idea who retiped
my cart. Strange ''base'' for believiving. All the 'straw man'' 
constructions against me were actually based on assumption
that my intention was to hurt Peter. I used the other example, 
Van den Hul with the same problem. When people state
 ''Van den Hul retiped my cart'' what are they referring to? 
Van den Hul himself or his company? Companies are theso called 
''legal bodies'' . Invented by lawyers in order to reduce risk for the 
entrepreneurs.
By separating comapies assets from his private assets. Such that
only company assets would be liable for their debts, But company
is not able to act. Only humans can act. So each legal body has
representatives who act in the name of the company. 
My point was that believes have nothing to do with the truth.
An statement is true or false irrespective  from what we believe.
 

@nandric, something is wrong with your Google Dutch to English translator, its spitting out gibberish.

testpilote , There is much wrong with your capability to learn. I just
explained  what ''someone'' or ''something'' means but you are
obviously not able to understand . My arguments are not based
on Dutch or other languages but on logic which is universal. Try
logic of quantification but I don't expect much from you. 
You are one of many who have no better arguments than ''straw
man'' kinds. That is avoiding arguments and instead ascribing
to the opponent ''bad character''. ''Colling names'' is, i think,
American expression for your ''arguments''. 

It's really quite rare to see a person doing such a damn fine job digging a hole for themselves.  Careful of the core on your way down nandric, I hear it's fairly hot.