Joe: When i was talking to Bill, i was going to mention your name, but i ended up getting sidetracked with the conversation that we were having. Needless to say, i was glad to have found someone that shared my love of this speaker and the specific design & performance attributes that it brings with it. This is especially true given Bill's level of exposure and experience with hundreds upon hundreds of various drivers and loudspeaker designs.
As you mentioned, Bill is very high on these speakers as they are from the factory, even though they could have been done better. He also mentioned to me that they are unrivaled once fully modified in the manner that he discussed. As i've mentioned in some other threads, these speakers, even with the less than optimum assembly from the factory, do some things so well that i will never part with mine. While they do have their shortcomings, Bill seems to think that his modifications fully address those problems. After discussing things with him, i can see how / why these problems / design shortcomings come about and how easy they would be to correct. I now realize how much better they may be after performing such mods to them.
Having said that, i've come up with a few design innovations that take his tweeks a bit further. The nice thing is that they involve the same amount of work, so they wouldn't be any tougher to impliment. Given that i'll probably end up rebuilding these drivers myself, i'm going to incorporate these ideas into the rebuild and see how it goes. My thoughts are that Bill's suggestions should improve performance quite drastically with my revisions simply adding a hair more icing to the cake.
Quite honestly, i've very seriously thought about producing a speaker similar to these, but made in a much more modern design. I've gone over a million different electro-mechanical design revisions in my head and keep coming back to one specific concept. This is all still in my head though, so maybe i'll be able to try out some of these ideas on my F drivers if / when i get around to rebuilding them.
At the same time that all of this is going on, my Brother is currently trying to build a prototype of a driver that he designed. I've tried to get him to work with me on the design of the driver that i have in my head, but he's got his mind on his own projects. While he is interested in the design that i came up with and would like to tinker with it, he wants to build his design first. His design is both easier and more conventional in operation than what i want to do. If he can get it to work as he thinks it will, that technology could be applied to my design too. Having said that, there's not a driver made that operates like what he has in mind, so even it is not exactly a "normal" dynamic driver. This driver should offer a phenomenal amount of control, transient capabilities and excursion capacity without generating near as much reflected EMF or impedance variations. Coupling those qualities with a Walsh based full-range omni-directional driver could prove to be a great thing. Needless to say, this is all a pipe dream at this stage of the game : ) Sean
>
As you mentioned, Bill is very high on these speakers as they are from the factory, even though they could have been done better. He also mentioned to me that they are unrivaled once fully modified in the manner that he discussed. As i've mentioned in some other threads, these speakers, even with the less than optimum assembly from the factory, do some things so well that i will never part with mine. While they do have their shortcomings, Bill seems to think that his modifications fully address those problems. After discussing things with him, i can see how / why these problems / design shortcomings come about and how easy they would be to correct. I now realize how much better they may be after performing such mods to them.
Having said that, i've come up with a few design innovations that take his tweeks a bit further. The nice thing is that they involve the same amount of work, so they wouldn't be any tougher to impliment. Given that i'll probably end up rebuilding these drivers myself, i'm going to incorporate these ideas into the rebuild and see how it goes. My thoughts are that Bill's suggestions should improve performance quite drastically with my revisions simply adding a hair more icing to the cake.
Quite honestly, i've very seriously thought about producing a speaker similar to these, but made in a much more modern design. I've gone over a million different electro-mechanical design revisions in my head and keep coming back to one specific concept. This is all still in my head though, so maybe i'll be able to try out some of these ideas on my F drivers if / when i get around to rebuilding them.
At the same time that all of this is going on, my Brother is currently trying to build a prototype of a driver that he designed. I've tried to get him to work with me on the design of the driver that i have in my head, but he's got his mind on his own projects. While he is interested in the design that i came up with and would like to tinker with it, he wants to build his design first. His design is both easier and more conventional in operation than what i want to do. If he can get it to work as he thinks it will, that technology could be applied to my design too. Having said that, there's not a driver made that operates like what he has in mind, so even it is not exactly a "normal" dynamic driver. This driver should offer a phenomenal amount of control, transient capabilities and excursion capacity without generating near as much reflected EMF or impedance variations. Coupling those qualities with a Walsh based full-range omni-directional driver could prove to be a great thing. Needless to say, this is all a pipe dream at this stage of the game : ) Sean
>