Speaker repair-need help

No "support legs" necessary. I figured that part out long ago ; )

As far as a frequency response of 120 Hz - 22 Khz, "decent" Ohm F will do WAY below 20 Hz up to somewhere between 15-17 KHz. If anything, i'd rather sacrifice some of the bottom end for a little more top end output and extension. This would help to even out the tonal balance as the bottom end on these things is P-O-T-E-N-T !!! Sean
>

Sean -- are you accepting pre-orders??

Greg: All i can say to that is.... BWA-HAhahaha... You would have better luck investing in venture capital with junk bond king Michael Milliken than you would waiting for me on a project of this magnitude and scope. Too many different projects and a lack of motivation to get them all done. I'm so spread out it is ridiculous. The bad thing is, i know i'm throwing away gobs of money on so many different ideas and marketable products ( not only electronics ) that i have in my head that it isn't funny.

If you learn one thing from and about me, learn this. Most Irish people are great tellers of tales and history, not the actual people that go out and make history happen. If the opposite were true, the corner saloons and pubs would be empty. All of those sitting round nursing a drink and spinning great and enjoyable yarns would get up off their ass and become the subject of those types of stories, not telling people of others' exploits. then again, those bar stools ( and computer chairs ) can get quite comfortable. Know what i mean? Sean
>

PS... To those of you that are of Irish descent and have their act together, i'm sorry for lumping you in with the rest of us. Drop me an email and share your secret with me, will ya? : )

Sean: LOL!

Sean...It would be interesting to read a A-B comparison review between the F's and Ohm's latest Walsh. I know they are different in many, many ways; the fact that they both have inverted cones may be the only thing left that they have in common and even at that, the cones are radicaly different. That being said...i have read a few reviews by people that did have the F's and traded them in for the latest Walsh and prefered the new ones, but they also got new electronics. Before i ordered the latest Walsh, i asked John at Ohm about the F's and he said the Walsh 5 MK-2 sound better. Another thing he said about the F's that i did not know, is that being that they are omni-directional, placement of the speakers becomes critical and sweet area becomes much smaller.
I would find your review on the Walsh 5 MK-2 very interesting, but as far as i know, you have never heard them. I have heard the F's once in a Shop a very long time ago and just remember i liked there spacious sound, but at that time i did not have two dimes to rub together.