2. speakers
  3. 1196003497

Stereophile Review of Quatro Wood

Anyone read the review of the Vandy Quatro Wood in the latest Stereophile? With this effort, Wes Phillips has moved the bar a full notch lower, further diminishing the relevance of the major audiophile rags.

After a (too) lengthy treatment of the design specifics, he touches on a fairly narrow range of performance characteristics and then spends the rest of the review on a useless (and superficial) comparison of the Quatro Wood and the Wilson WATT/Puppy 8--which is way more than double the price. What was he thinking? Why not compare the Quatro to several other similarly priced floorstanding models? How about a comparison with the sock version Quatro or the 5A? At least the consumer could get some sense of where the Quatro Wood falls within the Vandersteen line and whether the wood or the larger 5A is worth the extra bucks.

It's not that I am disappointed--the only reason I keep my subscription to these mags is because they are dirt cheap (a consequence of the inflated subscription figures that the low rate provides) and the record reviews are somewhat helpful. It's just that this particular review has demonstrated just how useless these reviews have become.
128x128dodgealum
Ag insider logo xs@2x
drubin
3,274 posts
 
I hear you. What I wondered about was why they even bothered to review this speaker since Fremer had reviewed the sock Quatro a while back. Is it that different?

I suppose he compared it to the Wilsons because that is his reference. But the reviewers today often avoid making comparisons that are appropriate and, therefore, useful.

However, reading between the lines, my take is that both Fremer in the earlier review and Phillips in this one admire the Quatros but don't really like them. Would you agree?
stubby
73 posts
 
I wonder why they never review any of the Von Schweikert line of speakers seems they have a loyalty to some makers while others are totally ignored.

I have a 3 year S'phile subscription, makes good bathroom reading.
mrjstark
1,112 posts
 
The whole purpose of this review is clearly laid out on the first page of the article.
Read it again put 2 & 2 together (what you know, what you read here - it is not that difficult to figure out what that review supposed to accomplished.

Mariusz
tom_hankins
928 posts
 
The only comparison I wanted to hear was going to be with the Quatro sock. I am very familiar with the Quatro, and like it alot. I want to know what the wood version offers over the sock version.
As far as the reviewers it seemed to me like Fremer liked the original more than Phillips liked his.
jiannone
2 posts
 
Has anyone checked the Hi-Fi+ reviews lately? They've been doing a lot of comparisons. It's pretty cool to see, for instance in the latest issue, an affordable CD+Integrated amp comparison across three different brands, or several reviewers writing about different bookshelves, etc.

I'm sure the highest dollar stuff won't get compared to other highest dollar stuff because, well, that would just be bad for business, but it's still good to see some legitimate comparisons.
More to discover