Synergistic Red Fuse ...

grannyring
I find the sound quality of the few MLP recordings I just listened to be full bodied and natural in tone with no upper mid or treble thinness or bite whatsoever. Very nice indeed.

I believe you. But compared to what? All these audiophile terms are completely subjective in nature. My "full bodied and natural" could be even more full bodied and natural than yours, no? I assume you are referring to CDs. If you compare the CD to the original LP I’m pretty sure you would agree with me the LP is more full bodied and natural. And if you take my advice and color the CD you will find the CD to sound more full bodied and natural. I did not fall off the turnip truck yesterday. 😛

mapman
GK if you truly think that about the MLP Cds (I doubt the sincerity of most everything you say) then you may have gotten some bad copies (I have almost 100 and none are bad) or else you may need to check out your Walkman for issues.

Ouch! Too much coffee, Mopman?

Mopman: All releases are somewhat different of course but MLP is consistently excellent.

The word excellent is meaningless. I never said they were terrible.

Mopman: What do you not understand about top notch?

Top notch means nothing to me. It means different things to different people. It’s a meaningless term in this hobby, that’s for sure.

Mopman: Your OCD is getting the best of you again.

ouch, again. Very ouch.

Mopman: You and your alternate facts. I suspect you are pretty lonely in this particular stance oh great seer!

Whoa! Get a grip, grasshopper. Look within. Actually now that you mention it, I don't crave confirmation, you know, like some folks I know.

Gk if you are truly listening to MLP recordings on a walkman and headphones, I can pretty much assure you are missing something. That might explain your opinions on MLP. I’m trying to help you out here..... :^)

Hi, Guyz ...

Its nice to see that the conversation has gotten around to the Mercury recordings. I have a nice collection both on vinyl and CD's. Here's what I've found over the years:

The best of the MLP's are truly terrific in both sound and performances. The least of them have a hardness and brightness to the sound. This just means that not all of them are great.  

The Starker cello CD's are among the best ... but there is only so much Bach solo cello that I can listen to at one sitting.   I have to be in the mood. For cello, I prefer Fred Katz playing with the Chico Hamilton Quintet:

 http://www.ebay.com/itm/CHICO-HAMILTON-QUINTET-South-Pacific-In-Hi-Fi-WORLD-PACIFIC-STEREO-1003-LP-M...

For orchestral music here is one of the all time best Mercury's. Its got the sound and the performance. Someone here should buy this one:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mercury-Living-Presence-CD-Antal-Dorati-conducts-Kodaly-and-Bartok-NM-/20161...

For the vinyl guys, if you're not aware of it ... the Mercury "Golden Imports" is a good way to go. These are the MLP's reissued on better vinyl and have better sound as a general rule than the originals ... and a lot less expensive to collect. Here's a good example:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/ROMEROS-PLAY-VIVALDI-MERCURY-GOLDEN-IMPORTS-MADE-IN-NETHERLANDS-LP-NM-/40124...

And finally, again for the vinyl guys, don't pass up the Mercury mono's. They can be really amazing too. Here's a person selling a small collection of the mono's. I'm thinking of bidding on these myself ... like I really NEED  more records: 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/MERCURY-LIVING-PRESENCE-OLYMPIAN-SERIES-LOT-OF-18-CLASSICAL-LPS-VG-to-NM-NR-...

Frank

Gk, good point. My point of reference then would have to be other recordings of same genre. Still subjective based on what I have heard on other recordings.  I have not heard MLP recodings on any other sources other then my system which is computer based with Roon/Tidal and ripped CDs.