Talk me out of buying Monoblocks and into a stereo amp instead

I was lucky enough to live with both the ARC Ref 160s stereo and 160m monoblocks for over two years. I have auditioned a couple other pairs as well. The differences seem pretty universal when the only difference is stereo versus monoblocks.

The monoblocks have a deeper wider and more defined soundstage. So the images are more stable and smaller, set in a larger soundstage. They are quieter (lower noise floor) helping to allow for the better imaging and soundstage. The stereo version has a bit greater impact as the power seems to be more concentrated on larger images across a smaller, shallow soundstage.

A big advantage of monoblocks is that you can locate them right next to the speakers and get really short speaker cables with will increase the dynamics and transients over a long run of speaker cable.

I think most people audiophiles would always prefer the monoblocks. However, folks that buy MacIntosh tend to value impact and slam over fitness. So, depending on your likes, it could go either way. If you drive a Corvette, get the stereo version, if you drive a Porsche get the monoblocks.

Sorry, I just have to say it... if you fall into the later category and are into highly nuanced sound and a system with great finesse... is this the right brand for you?,

Do you have a separate dedicated power line all ready installed for each mono? Are the wall plugs both the same? Is it no problem buying two of the same power cords? If yes to all GO FOR IT

Devils advocate, you have to consider that you need two power cords for monos. Sometimes it’s better a stereo with a high quality power cord than a Mono with medium quality PC’s, and man those can be very expensive too 

The more meters, the sweeter the juice.

Lol I have  four sets of mono blocks and one stereo amp. They are all good but I find the mono blocks just a bit better more costly in many ways to setup but toe it is worth it. 

Regards