Dr_Joe:
Thanks Dr. Joe. That was what I was thinking about too. If I am going to get me a used Thorens, then a TD 126 is the first model I am going to aim for. A distant second will be a TD 160, with a TD 147 coming in a close third right behind the TD 160. But it is said that somewhere that if I should opt for a 126, then I should go for a Mk I or a Mk II version, and not go for the Mk III. Is there any truth to that??? And if so, why?? But let it be said that if I be lucky enough to end up with a 126 (and I am going to try like hell to find one), then damping the chassis is going to be one of the improvements I am going to make on the table. The other improvements to make on my 126 will involve getting a couple of mats to compensate for the difference levels of thickness of the records themselves, getting a clamp, changing the arm to a Rega RB600 or RB900 (if such an arm should fit the big Thorens) or hunt down an SME 3009 if the none of the Regas should fit, and then changing the tone arm cable and then the interconnects after that. If for some reason I cannot find and land a Thorens TD 126, then the alternative would be an Oracle that is about 10 years old or so. The Oracle, to my knowledge, is a better table than the Thorens.
Anyway, thanks for the input, Joe.
--Charles--