My posts were based on the information you supplied or didn't. How can I ignore facts which weren't offered?
Trying to make someone wrong is a simple technique, which weve seen on the web countless times. In so doing, the goal is not mutual understanding but simply trying to make someone else wrong solely for the sake of doing so. It does not further knowledge. IOW I don't agree that your posts were based on what you say- as far as I can see, you want me to be wrong and go away, simply so you can be right.
I'm not here to make you wrong; someone asked a real question and I answered it with the accepted and correct engineering principle. It does not matter to me beyond that, others might disagree, but they are not wrong because **I** don't agree with them, they are wrong because they lack the engineering understanding:
Assuming your results are what you say, why should we accept this as
the last word on this matter? Prominent table/arm designers have
reached different conclusions. You're more knowledgeable than Kuzma,
Reed, or Torqueo Audio?
Reed site had a set of resonance numbers which favored the pod. They're gone now, but your anecdotes are fact?
To the latter: of course, but to be clear they are not anecdotal if backed up with the measurements; of which so far I seem to be the only one here to have caused their hand to move to get (and I hope the irony of this conversation is not lost on anyone....).
To the former: apparently, if you are saying by being correct on this subject I'm more knowledgeable, but I'm not under the illusion that because I am correct about this that I know more than someone else. What's happening is I understand the engineering, that's all.
I've been designing tube stuff and mastering all along- no need to go back, I'm already there. I know why the 'results differ'.
It does seem though that this rather odious bubble has been popped and its contents safely dispersed without harm to the parties in the vicinity.
