Dinster,
I have the Feikert App and the 10" Test record to go with it and have done repeated testing on both my tables using my iPad and posting the relevant print-outs.
The important thing about scientific or objective testing...is 'repeatability'.
In other words....every time you or I proceed to test exactly the same thing....we should achieve exactly the same result?
With the Feikert App.....I achieved different results every single time I repeated exactly the same tests?
In some cases...the results even showed the Raven AC-2 giving better results than the Victor TT-101? :-)
The test record itself was a major part of the problem.....
Due to the fact that it contains a modulated groove of exactly 3150Hz....it is essential that the record hole is dead-centre.
This is simply unachievable to the degree necessary to avoid variations from that constant test tone.
With the Timeline......every test result is repeatable....
I have the Feikert App and the 10" Test record to go with it and have done repeated testing on both my tables using my iPad and posting the relevant print-outs.
The important thing about scientific or objective testing...is 'repeatability'.
In other words....every time you or I proceed to test exactly the same thing....we should achieve exactly the same result?
With the Feikert App.....I achieved different results every single time I repeated exactly the same tests?
In some cases...the results even showed the Raven AC-2 giving better results than the Victor TT-101? :-)
The test record itself was a major part of the problem.....
Due to the fact that it contains a modulated groove of exactly 3150Hz....it is essential that the record hole is dead-centre.
This is simply unachievable to the degree necessary to avoid variations from that constant test tone.
With the Timeline......every test result is repeatable....