Ugly vs Gogeous speakers

soundsrealaudio wrote:
 " When I was younger I designed and built a pair of speakers that looked like Pamela Sue Anderson. Thought I could mass produce them and they would sell like,,,well sell like Playboy magazine. I had some venture capitalists interested but all they wanted was a proto type to take home."  

These could have been big sellers if the port had been strategically located.  :-)

Have not seen for a while, but I suppose the speaker I recall that I found perhaps most visually appealing of all are Jadis Eurythmie.

http://www.monoandstereo.com/2015/01/jadis-eurythmie-special-edition-horn.html

Me like! Gotta convince wife.... Or settle for something similar but a bit toned down and more practical:

http://www.hifi-review.com/151568-jbl-studio-580.html

...also more WAF.

This one was very cool:

http://centralcal.com/ds.htm

Wife like Victorian!   Could be....

I like exotic woods liked striped ebony and at one point nearly bought a pair of Thiels just for that (and they sounded good of course). Alas, I have generally bought speakers for sound only…Vandersteen 1Bs years ago…a large sock…Silverline Preludes vinyl veneer in fake rosewood (looks more like walnut, but very resistant to damage), lots of all black stuff, rosewood Viennas. My recently acquired Heresy IIIs I yammer about were ordered as simply black, but I was sent the more pricey Capitol Edition Ebony that's sort of a dark purple with matched veneer you can't possibly see…fine with me. Note that the stock "salt and pepper" grills are prone to sagging (weird) and Klipsch offered to send a new set although they noted it's an issue with that grill fabric. I had already ordered a set of standard black grills that are sag free, and it was easy to move the Capitol badge to those since they use a rubbery sticky stuff that seems to have staying power. The black grills look great with the "purple" finish.

I like exotic woods liked striped ebony and at one point nearly bought a pair of Thiels just for that (and they sounded good of course).

Same here.

When I first started contemplating buying a Thiel 2.7 or 3.7 years ago someone had offered to sell me the most gorgeous looking 2.7s in ebony.  I knew they would be perfect for my room, but couldn't help be tempted by going all the way to the flagship 3.7s, so I got the 3.7s in a finish that is high quality, but not the perfect shade for my room.

Letting those original ebony 2.7s go nagged at me ever after and when a pair miraculously appeared (never seen them before or since) on Audiogon a while back I grabbed them as quick as I could.  And at a killer price!

They are among the most attractive speakers I've ever seen and are also a perfect color/aesthetic fit for my room. And fortunately I like their sound better than just about anything else I've auditioned (except they are neck-in-neck with my bigger Thiel 3.7s). So it's a win-win-win situation of having the sound I want with exactly the aesthetics I desired.

I'll buy for sound, even if the speakers are butt ugly.  I presently own a pair of Ohm 1000's painted black.  They look good to me, but I want speakers that let me forget I'm listening to speakers and allow me to concentrate on the sound rather than the source, which the Ohms do.  You CAN get the best of both worlds, but the whole point is basically what appeals to my ears, not my eyes.