Not chased, just waiting for the zealots to inhale.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/zealots
The issue of dynamic compression seems to be academic, after all we've had decades of practical use, and minuscule amount of reported failure. Even the author of the provided link suggests what ever deficiencies might exist, might not be audible.
Perhaps Mrdecibel should consider just who should get over whom.
Attempts to use gang bullying, and suggestions of psychological shortcomings of those who don't agree, are pathetic attempts to negate opposing points of view.
One could easily return the question of; where is the science to prove that horns don't get in their own way in such a manner to compromise coherence?
I'm quite done with all of this, but I leave of my own accord, not because I've been chased away, and I reserve the right to return, should I feel the want.
BTW, I still stand by my first post on this thread; the VMPS's might be worth a consideration.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/zealots
The issue of dynamic compression seems to be academic, after all we've had decades of practical use, and minuscule amount of reported failure. Even the author of the provided link suggests what ever deficiencies might exist, might not be audible.
Perhaps Mrdecibel should consider just who should get over whom.
Attempts to use gang bullying, and suggestions of psychological shortcomings of those who don't agree, are pathetic attempts to negate opposing points of view.
One could easily return the question of; where is the science to prove that horns don't get in their own way in such a manner to compromise coherence?
I'm quite done with all of this, but I leave of my own accord, not because I've been chased away, and I reserve the right to return, should I feel the want.
BTW, I still stand by my first post on this thread; the VMPS's might be worth a consideration.