What is the best sounding Mahler symphony cycle?


Folks... I love Mahler but my two versions of the 5th sound very low-fi. I am looking for a well --- really well --- recorded 5th on redbook CD --- or better still... a whole mahler symphony cycle that is audiophile (or... near audiophile quality.

Any help would be appreciated
robsker
Sorry, hit the wrong button above.
I am not just an audiophile.  Most of my favorite recordings, of Mahler or any other Composer, would not win audiophile awards.  However, this is an audiophile site, and I would like to get feedback on what people think are the best sounding recordings.  I post in a few Classical Music sites, where audiophiles are routinely ridiculed as we are elsewhere.  So here I would like to indulge my love of sound and not be censored for it.
I think that you are being hard on the Budapest Festival Orchestra.  I am not claiming that it can equal Chicago or Vienna , etc.,for lung power, and I thought I made that pretty clear.  What they have done, however, remarkably well, is create a MittelEuropa type of sound, that may have been what the finest Orchestras that weren’t Berlin or Vienna may  have sounded like in Mahler’s day (and let’s not forget that GM worked quite a bit in the Hungarian Capital).
  If you wish to limit your listening to “how the very  top Orchestras perform these works” be my guest.  To imply that the Budapest is some kind of semi pro outfit that is out of their depth, however, is engaging in hyperbole.  I agree that the Fisher /Budapest Ninth isn’t competitive, as a performance with the very best, nor have I heard any Mahler recording by them that displaces any of my favorites.
This isn’t because the Budapest cycle is bad, but because the bar is so incredibly high.  Look how many Mahler recordings are out there!  Most of the greatest Conductors of the last 50 years are represented, along with quite a few “Who?”  What the Channel Classic recordings, are, however, are the most realistic reproduction of how the actual Orchestra sounds that I am personally familiar with.  They represent a fine Orchestra faithfully reproduced.  The performances are at worst passable.
Why stick to one conductor and one orchestra? You can compile your own favorite cycle.
Here’s mine:
#1: Bruno Walter / Columbia Symphony (columbia USA)
#2: Otto Klemperer / Philharmonia Orchestra (emi/columbia UK)
#3: Zubin Mehta / LAPO (decca)
#4: Georg Szell / Cleveland Orchestra (columbia UK)
#5: John Barbirolli / New Philharmonia Orchestra (hmv)
#6: Georg Solti / Chicago Symphony (decca)
#7: Leonard Bernstein / NYPO (DGG)
#8: Georg Solti / Chicago Symphony (decca)
#9: Bruno Walter / Columbia Symphony (columbia USA)

This is almost exclusively based on the original vinyl issues (except the Bernstein 7th), but I’m sure these performances are all available on cd or SACD. Don’t know about the quality of the digital transfers, but the sound quality on vinyl is mostly excellent (exceptional in the case of the Mehta 3rd).


@edgewear

Of course no one is restricted to just one cycle, and not every conductor has an equal affinity for each piece.  So here goes.
#1 Horenstein/LSO
#2 Abbado/Chicago 
#3-Bernstein/NYP first recording. Abbado/Lucerne 
#4-Szell
#5-Honeck/Pittsburgh or Walter/NYP (mono)
#6-Karajan/BPO. #7 Bernstein/NY Phil (Sony)
#8 Solti
#9 Karel Ancerl/Czech PO

Das Lied-Reiner or Walter (stereo)

#10. Without getting into the question of which edition—Dausgaard/Seattle 

I like your choices, all of which I have in my collection, except the Mehta (had it on  vinyl but sold off my analog rig a few years ago).