When Audio Jumps The Shark.


Do you ever feel like some people over complicate their approach to audio?

 

you are definitely on the right path to gain a better understanding.

Why is that? Well, Mercury is the smallest planet, and it is closest to the Sun. So, you need to use Einstein’s relativity equations to get an accurate prediction of Mercury’s orbit. Relativism is significant in Mercury’s orbit.

This doesn’t make Kepler’s equations useless or wrong. It just shows the limitations of the equations.

The above is an abbreviated response to a question, what’s more important when putting together an audio system, subjective or objective criteria? Of course the answer is straightforward, if you want to own a system you’ll enjoy listening to, try listening to your system while you’re setting it up. Simple.

Yours in music,

Ted Denney III

Lead Designer/CEO Synergistic Research Inc.

 

128x128ted_denney

The approach is simple. Objective criteria far outweighs subjective preference. It seems since I no longer read post from your most ardent shills you've stepped up your agenda driven posts. This is becoming a nuisance. If you're here to promote your "toys", Do so in an appropriate manner.

In this case subjective hearing control and experience are CORRELATED at EACH step of the installation experimental process with the objective calculus and equations or objective physical and non physical aspect of physical acoustic and psycho-acoustic...

This is a response as to what is more important where sound quality is concerned, Objective measurement, or subjectively listening to see if you like the way a stereo sounds.

A manufacturer of audio aftermarket items asking about over complicating things-the irony.