When is digital going to get the soul of music?

I don't listen to much large scale orchestral music so I have no opinion in that regard. For the acoustic jazz and big band I listen to and know well I find the formats very competitive and enjoyable with a 'good' set up. I've heard both formats sound poor also.

Agreed Charles! I too find acoustic jazz and big band satisfactory in the digital format and it would be, to me, splitting hairs concerning the preference of one over the other. I just don't understand why this doesn't carry over as convincingly with large scale orchestral. Overall though, at its very best I would say I would prefer a good vinyl recording over the same digital all thing being equal less the inconvenience of dealing with vinyl, it is just a bit more relaxed and natural to my ears. But having said that I wouldn't agree that digital music playback doesn't get to the soul, it sure can.

No doubt large scale orchestral works is an area that when you look at the state of the overall big picture, vinyl probably still rules. part is sound quality and part is all those fantastic classical recordings available at the Goodwill store for a pittance compared to what it would cost anywhere on CD.

Has nothing to do with getting the soul though.

Hi Tubegroover ,
I'll give analog a "subtle"(but noticeable) edge in the realm of relaxation and sense of organic flow and ease. This advantage only applies to the very top set ups, as some analog front ends don't possess this same ability. I've heard some select digital front ends (certainly not all) that are exceptionally natural, realistic and with much emotion conveyed (better than some turntable sources with etched, bright and edgy cartridges). Massed string sections I'll defer to your experience.
Charles,

Kapa started an OP and asked for comments about this article. http://xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html

The author says "[t]he BAS test I linked earlier mentions as an aside that the SACD version of a recording can sound substantially better than the CD release. **It's not because of increased sample rate or depth but because the SACD used a higher-quality master.** When bounced to a CD-R, the SACD version still sounds as good as the original SACD and better than the CD release **because the original audio used to make the SACD was better. Good production and mastering obviously contribute to the final quality of the music.**" (**Emphasis added**)

What else is there to say?????