Wireworld Silver Starlight

Fuzzfriendly, Simao,
Yes, I am saying the very inexpensive Redmere 18Gbps provided better video sharpness, color, naturalness, etc. than the very expensive WireWorld Silver Starlight 7.
Now I am using it on my Samsung 85" Ultra Led. But, even on my 45" the picture quality improved.

Simao, you are wrong, plain and simple. The Redmere have a little amp built into the design. Try one, they won't cost you more than about 20 bucks.

There is a HUGE difference in HDMI cables. I auditioned a few, but the Wireworld is significantly better....better sound, better picture by far. I forgot what level my HDMI Wireworld is, but its purple and great.

Ozzy, if I'm wrong plain and simple, then the technicians and writers at CNet and other sources (see below) are also wrong. What most of these sources say is that cable length determines picture quality as does the HDMI sending/receiving circuitry in your components.

http://www.audioholics.com/audio-video-cables/truth-about-expensive-hdmi-cables

Simao, this is the same argument that I had on Forums years ago about power cords.
Please try one.

Problem is, I have. I've used $15 Best Buy HDMI; I've used Audioquest cables costing over $300 new. My receiver is a 4K-ready Onkyo with tremendous rep. I've never used more than a 6' HDMI cord from either the receiver or the laptop or the tv. And I really can't tell the difference.

Power cords, however, I can.