Yet another Qobuz vs. Tidal debate

I started off with Tidal and have been very happy with them. I have been very happy with Tidal's MQA format also. I just recently subscribed to Qobuz and will keep both until I decide which I prefer. 

I have found also that Tidal with Roon sounds a little better than my CDs and the MQA versions even a little better.  Qobuz is still new to me , so I plan and take my time to compare to Tidal. So far , they both sound about the same with Tidal's MQA and Qobuz' High Rez ,  but it is still early for me. 

I love Qobuz’s sound and the library is pretty good. That said, I also get drop outs using a modern MacBook Pro and wired gigabit internet service. 

edcyn:  agree.  the drop-outs are annoying.    

I've been a TIDAL subscriber for approx 3 years.  I signed up for a 30-day Qobuz trial. I was skeptical at first but am finding the Qobuz catalog comparable to TIDAL for my tastes mainly in rock/jazz.

There seems to be more hires albums in Qobuz compared to TIDAL MQA albums.  I'm trying to avoid the MQA debate so I won't comment on whether I feel Qobuz hires sounds better than TIDAL MQA..

I did discover that I can play Qobuz hi-rez titles in my car and the sound is amazing.  I assume playing TIDAL MQA titles in most car stereos plays MQA tracks at redbook CD 44.1KHz/16 bit resolution.

At the Qobuz intro price of $15/month compared to $20/month for TIDAL high fidelity, I'll probably make the switch. 

Agree.  Qobuz actually sent an offer to me to extend the studio premier service (96HZ hi-res) subscription for $149/yr.  not bad.    
Still getting a lot of drop-outs depending on what time of day I'm listening but I think that would happen with any streaming service.