Yet another Qobuz vs. Tidal debate


I'm not convinced that I'm getting "CD Quality" from either service even though I've paid a premium for it.  In terms of the catalog, Tidal has Qobuz beat hands down.  Not even close IMO.  I like the user interface a little more with Tidal.  Similar artists populate right under the album listings.  However, Tidal is expensive when compared to Qobuz, if you're a long term subscriber. With Qobuz I received a considerable discount with a 1 year subscription.  I was paying $24 month (with taxes inc) for Tidal and that was a year ago. It's probably gone up from that. $300 a year buys a lot of CD's (especially when I usually buy mine used).  Has anyone else been as disillusioned as I am?     
russellrcncom
Just ended my Tidal subscription and am moving onto Qobuz.  Qobuz just sounds a little better on my system.  Little more organic and natural. A tad less electronic if you will.  Not day and night, but enough to cause me to switch. 
I started off with Tidal and have been very happy with them. I have been very happy with Tidal's MQA format also. I just recently subscribed to Qobuz and will keep both until I decide which I prefer. 

I have found also that Tidal with Roon sounds a little better than my CDs and the MQA versions even a little better.  Qobuz is still new to me , so I plan and take my time to compare to Tidal. So far , they both sound about the same with Tidal's MQA and Qobuz' High Rez ,  but it is still early for me. 
I love Qobuz’s sound and the library is pretty good. That said, I also get drop outs using a modern MacBook Pro and wired gigabit internet service.