Blindjim,
What an interesting perspective...a man of great intelligence.
Any product presented, meeting all the base requirements of a given market or human need have what is known as 'utility'. Utility, (going back in to distant memeory of Econ101), is explained as follows.
"A glass of water to a man floating in a crystal clear lake, has 'no value.' Yet the same glass of water is of infinite value to a man dying of thirst in a desert."
Ahhh...enter want v. need. (sounds like a Supreme court decision, no?)
We, all of us here 'want' the latest toy with the cool looking knobs and such, (oh hell admit it). I remember a great writer for one of the Paper Mags, saying one time that one of his guilty pleaures was looking at his system in the dark. (I'm thinking he was auditioning the latest tube system from Mssrs conrad and johnson). He stated categorically, that anyone who denies having done that is flat out lying.
So enter the hobbyiest notions of this 'pricing' discussion, with our interpretatins of 'fair and reasonable.'
How do we determine fair and and reasonable, and need versus want?
Abstract: "Hey Jack, I'm going to compress carbon under hundreds of thousands of pounds of pressure for several million years then present you with the results for your birthday. Want a 1 pound or 2 pound one of those?'
Jack not knowing of which he speaks says 'no thanks'.
Then, show his wife a picture of the result, under halogen lights and get HER answer.
In an audiophiles mind, that compressed carbon has 'infinite' value when we see it. (Think Farrah Fawcett's 1980's poster).
Since money is an elastic for us all, we, like Blindjims example pay whatever when we are flush. As the money contracts, we start to hedge, self mitigating our desire for said product. Then comes the chiseling of price.
Actually, it's none of our business what it costs to make a jar of Peter Pan Peanut Butter, or a gallon of milk from Deans. We only know we need them and buy them because they're food. Imagine going in a grocery and saying, "Hey would you take .59c for that jar instead of $2.59, I saw one on PeanutgoN for .45c. The can was still sealed and it had an acceptable expriation date (see warranty).
We ONLY bitch about pricing because this is a luxury commodity, and we ONLY bitch and care about margins because this is a luxury commodity.
I have sold to enough extremely wealthy folks to know this one thing. "They don't ask what the margin is." They want it to work, follow up, good service.
I'll never forget proposing the most expensive audio system I had ever fashioned together, to a neuro surgeon. I gave he and his wife three options, good, better and best, fearing the price, and thinking that I might scare him off. They studied the proposals for a while as I sweated. Then after what seemed an eternity, he asked, "If I buy this...(wait...wait...wait...) will it be better than Dr. XYX's system ?" (his best friend) exhale!
Jim Thiel and I were having dinner one night, and after a few glasses of vino, I said, "You know, I'd still sell audio if I were ridiculously wealthy." He looked at me for the longest time, then said, "Yeah...but then, you probably wouldn't be very good at it."
It's the same as, "If you had a billion dollars, would you own a Ferrari?" Answer, "Naaaa, I don't like them." RIGHT! Give that man the $1B then visit him later and check out his garage.
"Fair pricing" is only fair or unfair in our personal lexicons, and as I can only hope to gleen from our 'margin and pricing discussions here, are fair only, if WE can afford it. Let's be real here and realize that the business model I showed in an earlier post would not suit very many of you out there. Who would own a business, work countless hours per day and worry 24/7, lie awake at night staring at the ceiling, and WISH to make $3800. per month?
Some genius will shout back, "Well, uhhh, if they don't like it, let them get another job, noone's forcing them." True, but then, we have, no distribution, no demos, no 'used gear'.
I would submit that "Fair pricing" is fair if it is balanced with competition within it's market and performance. Beyond that, some of it seems tend to make pricing fair or unfair if 'we can afford it.'
If the prices as we know them now at the Local Audio Stores were truly unfair, (too much margin, specifically as we almost,repeat, almost have to consider that that manufacturers pricing because of competitive forces has to be at least reasonable), why is it so hard for those B&M dealers to stay in business?
Do I want a bargain? Sure, but the best price is not always the best deal.
Thoughts?
What an interesting perspective...a man of great intelligence.
Any product presented, meeting all the base requirements of a given market or human need have what is known as 'utility'. Utility, (going back in to distant memeory of Econ101), is explained as follows.
"A glass of water to a man floating in a crystal clear lake, has 'no value.' Yet the same glass of water is of infinite value to a man dying of thirst in a desert."
Ahhh...enter want v. need. (sounds like a Supreme court decision, no?)
We, all of us here 'want' the latest toy with the cool looking knobs and such, (oh hell admit it). I remember a great writer for one of the Paper Mags, saying one time that one of his guilty pleaures was looking at his system in the dark. (I'm thinking he was auditioning the latest tube system from Mssrs conrad and johnson). He stated categorically, that anyone who denies having done that is flat out lying.
So enter the hobbyiest notions of this 'pricing' discussion, with our interpretatins of 'fair and reasonable.'
How do we determine fair and and reasonable, and need versus want?
Abstract: "Hey Jack, I'm going to compress carbon under hundreds of thousands of pounds of pressure for several million years then present you with the results for your birthday. Want a 1 pound or 2 pound one of those?'
Jack not knowing of which he speaks says 'no thanks'.
Then, show his wife a picture of the result, under halogen lights and get HER answer.
In an audiophiles mind, that compressed carbon has 'infinite' value when we see it. (Think Farrah Fawcett's 1980's poster).
Since money is an elastic for us all, we, like Blindjims example pay whatever when we are flush. As the money contracts, we start to hedge, self mitigating our desire for said product. Then comes the chiseling of price.
Actually, it's none of our business what it costs to make a jar of Peter Pan Peanut Butter, or a gallon of milk from Deans. We only know we need them and buy them because they're food. Imagine going in a grocery and saying, "Hey would you take .59c for that jar instead of $2.59, I saw one on PeanutgoN for .45c. The can was still sealed and it had an acceptable expriation date (see warranty).
We ONLY bitch about pricing because this is a luxury commodity, and we ONLY bitch and care about margins because this is a luxury commodity.
I have sold to enough extremely wealthy folks to know this one thing. "They don't ask what the margin is." They want it to work, follow up, good service.
I'll never forget proposing the most expensive audio system I had ever fashioned together, to a neuro surgeon. I gave he and his wife three options, good, better and best, fearing the price, and thinking that I might scare him off. They studied the proposals for a while as I sweated. Then after what seemed an eternity, he asked, "If I buy this...(wait...wait...wait...) will it be better than Dr. XYX's system ?" (his best friend) exhale!
Jim Thiel and I were having dinner one night, and after a few glasses of vino, I said, "You know, I'd still sell audio if I were ridiculously wealthy." He looked at me for the longest time, then said, "Yeah...but then, you probably wouldn't be very good at it."
It's the same as, "If you had a billion dollars, would you own a Ferrari?" Answer, "Naaaa, I don't like them." RIGHT! Give that man the $1B then visit him later and check out his garage.
"Fair pricing" is only fair or unfair in our personal lexicons, and as I can only hope to gleen from our 'margin and pricing discussions here, are fair only, if WE can afford it. Let's be real here and realize that the business model I showed in an earlier post would not suit very many of you out there. Who would own a business, work countless hours per day and worry 24/7, lie awake at night staring at the ceiling, and WISH to make $3800. per month?
Some genius will shout back, "Well, uhhh, if they don't like it, let them get another job, noone's forcing them." True, but then, we have, no distribution, no demos, no 'used gear'.
I would submit that "Fair pricing" is fair if it is balanced with competition within it's market and performance. Beyond that, some of it seems tend to make pricing fair or unfair if 'we can afford it.'
If the prices as we know them now at the Local Audio Stores were truly unfair, (too much margin, specifically as we almost,repeat, almost have to consider that that manufacturers pricing because of competitive forces has to be at least reasonable), why is it so hard for those B&M dealers to stay in business?
Do I want a bargain? Sure, but the best price is not always the best deal.
Thoughts?