I Just Don't Hear It - I wish I did


I am frustrated because I am an audiophile who cannot discern details from so many of the methods praised by other audiophiles. I joke about not having golden ears. That said, I can easily discern and appreciate good soundstage, image, balance, tone, timbre, transparency and even the synergy of a system. I am however unable to hear the improvements that result from, say a piece of Teflon tape or a $5.00 item from the plumbing aisle at Home Depot. Furthermore, I think it is grossly unfair that I must pay in multiples of one hundred, or even one thousand just to gain relatively slight improvements in transparency, detail, timbre soundstage, etc., when other audiophiles can gain the same level of details from a ten dollar tweak. In an effort to sooth my frustration, I tell myself that my fellow audiophiles are experiencing a placebo effect of some sort. Does anyone else struggle to hear….no wait; does anyone else struggle to comprehend how someone else can hear the perceived benefits gained by the inclusion of any number of highly touted tweaks/gimmicks (brass screws, copper couplers, Teflon tape, maple hardwood, racquet balls, etc.) I mean, the claims are that these methods actually result in improved soundstage, image, detail (“blacker backgrounds”), clarity, bass definition, etc.
Am I alone in my frustration here?
2chnlben
I'm not a (secular) humanist, btw.
I'm not really sure what I am and don't care.
As long as I'm not late for dinner.
No one needs to pay any heed to you nor your willingness by self-selection to serve as a Scam Police

I quite agree - everyone is free to spend as they wish. I just report what is common thinking in science circles. Wrong they may all be, but you won't find many Engineers that can be easily convinced they could benefit from speaker cable elevators in an audio system.
Nor would you be likely to find any physicists who would say there could be no effect. I have heard too many EEs say that electrons don't know what cable they have flowed through and other ridiculous statements to pay them much heed.
A further thought. I once served on a doctorate committee in civil engineering where the candidate sought how to build on landfill. He sought many solutions, but ultimately stated that only penetrating it with footing would work. This may be true and may ultimately be cheapest, but there may be a better solution for someone with a more open approach. The Tacoma Narrows bridge is another example.
Nor would you be likely to find any physicists who would say there could be no effect.

I know what you mean, this is the type of argument used by the "catastrophic" Global Warming advocates - they all point out that C02 is a greenhouse gas therefore it must have an effect. This is all true but it is the relative size of the effect compared to other factors which is actually relevant. No doubt the kind of shampoo one uses might have some effect on the sound quality too.