What Printed Magazine do you prefer?

It seems like every year I drop one and pick up another. It generally takes me about a year to become bored with a magazine and begin looking for some fresh perspective, and each has its + and -'s.

This year it was drop the Absolute Sound and pick up Stereophile. For $11/year in this economy it is a no brainer.

What Hi-Fi generally has sensible advice...if you can call anything sensible in the mad world of audio rag hyperbole...

One that does not rely on ads for revenue.

Brianw, all periodicals rely on ads to operate,sad but true. Subscriptions and one at a time sales do not come anywhere near enough to keep them in business. I would love to see a magazine like this but it's not going to happen.

I like HiFi+ too, but contrary to everyone else, am thrilled Roy Gregory is gone. He was always interesting, but sooo pleased with himself. My favourite was a review of some mega speakers. The quote was to the effect, I moved them 5mm and everything snapped into place. If I moved them to the next room, I would hear a difference, but 5mm?
I have to admit a personal prejudice. I wrote a letter to the effect that differential pricing between countries was particularly iniquitous and he published an abusive 3 page reply in the magazine. No right of reply to me of course.
In general + is no better than the other magazines, when it comes down to it, it is the advertisers, distributors that pay the bills and whose interests the magazines favour.
Thats why I like Bound for Sound and HiFiCritic, but the latter is so very expensive. No adverts, it shows who really pays the bills, advertisers.
Incidentally, has anyone read Arhur Salvatores views on reviewers and copies of his correspondence with Michael Fremer. Wonderfully abusive and threatening, on both sides.