2. analog
  3. 1325551242

Eminent Technology ET-2 Tonearm Owners


Where are you? What mods have you done ?

I have been using these ET2's for over 9 years now.
I am still figuring them out and learning from them. They can be modified in so many ways. Bruce Thigpen laid down the GENIUS behind this tonearm over 20 years ago. Some of you have owned them for over 20 years !

Tell us your secrets.

New owners – what questions do you have ?

We may even be able to coax Bruce to post here. :^)

There are so many modifications that can be done.

Dressing of the wire with this arm is critical to get optimum sonics along with proper counterweight setup.

Let me start it off.

Please tell us what you have found to be the best wire for the ET-2 tonearm ? One that is pliable/doesn’t crink or curl. Whats the best way of dressing it so it doesn’t impact the arm. Through the spindle - Over the manifold - Below manifold ? What have you come up with ?
128x128ct0517
richardkrebs
422 posts
 
Frogman.
20 years! It gets scary when you start thinking back doesn't it?
I also have a continuous run to the pre but put it inside purely for cosmetic reasons. My thoughts would be to route it such that it stands off from the wand a little. In theory there would still be some interaction between wand and wire, due to proximity. That said, the level of this may be just too tiny to notice. Have you per chance tried this?
frogman
7,452 posts
 
Richard, it does get scary! I have not tried that, but I will. Thanks for the tip; I will report back.
dover
2,247 posts
 
Hi Richardkrebs

Had a very good Easter beak, very relaxing. Thank you for asking.

Was wondering, now that you know how the ET2 works, whether you had found time over the long Easter break to remove the lead from your arm, put the decoupling spring back in, dial in the vertical effective mass ( less lead further out for your cartridge ) and set the I Beam resonance below the arm resonance as prescribed in the manuals.

Frogman, Chris & Slaw have all found significant gains with the correct decoupling strategy employed. Frogman has reported significantly more bass information loosening off the end cap as per my suggestion some weeks ago.

I would be very interested to hear what sort of improvements you get when you get the arm back to standard configuration.

Looking forward to hearing how it goes.
ct0517's avatar
ct0517 OP
2,041 posts
 
ET2 ET2.5 - Aluminum Gooseneck Update

Just a reminder on this initiative. I will post a reminder once more in a couple of months.

I have received some replies and we have four people so far who are interested in aluminum goosenecks. One size fits the ET2 and ET 2.5. This would replace the current carbon fibre part that joins the armtube to the spindle with an aluminum one.

If enough people are interested we can get Bruce to do a special run of them. The price would be based on the number of people interested.

If interested please contact me at bcpguy(at)bell(dot)net for details

I am not affiliated with this other than wanting one myself. I am one of the four people so far.

Cheers
ct0517's avatar
ct0517 OP
2,041 posts
 
Richardkrebs
I don't have any first hand experience with arm pods. They tend to go against the grain so to speak, in the quest for absolute dimensional stability between platter and arm. That said it seems that there are many admirers of this approach and, other than to quote others, it would not be prudent for me to comment on the sound of something I have not personally heard.

The best statement I have read yet from someone that has not tried them. A refreshingly honest answer. Thanks Richard.

Anyone the least bit curious about them can check out the Copernican thread. Some "robust debate" there.

Cheers

More to discover