hi cyclonicman:
please don't confuse lack of interest with lack of discernment. a person can detect a difference between quality of things, without being interested.
its a matter of priorities. where the priority is high, one will be more dilligent, where priority or interest is low, one may be more superficial in one's evaluation or not be concerned of the difference.
the fact the sound is not important to mnay people or the fact that the size, clarity, or color of a video image is of little concern, where someone would be content to view a movie on a less than clear or lifelike color image does not imply a deficit in intelligence or dicsrnment, but is rather an expresion of taste or lack thereof.
this aapplies to food as well, wher someone is content to eat a hamburger and does not desire a more expensive cut of meat.
the more expensive steak, e.g, is easily recognizable but someone may not care to eat it.
in general, one who does not strive for the best is not always ignorant of what the best is.
please don't confuse lack of interest with lack of discernment. a person can detect a difference between quality of things, without being interested.
its a matter of priorities. where the priority is high, one will be more dilligent, where priority or interest is low, one may be more superficial in one's evaluation or not be concerned of the difference.
the fact the sound is not important to mnay people or the fact that the size, clarity, or color of a video image is of little concern, where someone would be content to view a movie on a less than clear or lifelike color image does not imply a deficit in intelligence or dicsrnment, but is rather an expresion of taste or lack thereof.
this aapplies to food as well, wher someone is content to eat a hamburger and does not desire a more expensive cut of meat.
the more expensive steak, e.g, is easily recognizable but someone may not care to eat it.
in general, one who does not strive for the best is not always ignorant of what the best is.