thr word better is frequently used when comparing the sound of components.
yet, it leads to ambiguity when there is no statement of the specifics as to why one component is better than another.
aside from the obvious connotation that better entails a subjective perception, the termm leads to ambiguity when used by itself.
i would hope that in the future when the word better is used in the context of comparing components, the user will explain what he /she means by "better".
Of course on a macro level, everything is probably better than components were decades ago. But at, and within each step, on this journey, it's not so simple to tell what is better. Peace
Nonoise: yea, had the SWAG v AFD dropped on me at a party, and immediately fell in love with it. Caught the first few episodes of House of Lies, then lost the thread (life had the gall to interfere, as it will). Definitely rings of management consulting mumbo jumbo, no doubt.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.