What Does Holographic Sound Like?


And how do you get there? This is an interesting question. I have finally arrived at a very satisfying level of holography in my system. But it has taken a lot of time, effort and money to get there. I wish there had been a faster, easier and less expensive way to get there. But I never found one.

Can you get to a high level of holography in your system with one pair of interconnects and one pair of speaker wires? I don't believe so. I run cables in series. I never found one pair of interconnects and speaker wires that would achieve what has taken a heck of a lot of wires and "tweaks" to achieve. Let alone all the power cords that I run in series. Although I have found one special cable that has enabled the system to reach a very high level of holography -- HiDiamond -- I still need to run cables in series for the sound to be at its holographic best.

There are many levels of holography. Each level is built incrementally with the addition of one more wire and one more "tweak". I have a lot of wires and "tweaks" in my system. Each cable and each "tweak" has added another level to the holography. Just when I thought things could not get any better -- which has happened many times -- the addition of one more cable or "tweak" enabled the system to reach a higher level yet.

Will one "loom" do the job. I never found that special "loom". To achieve the best effects I have combined cables from Synergistic Research, Bybee, ASI Liveline, Cardas, Supra and HiDiamond -- with "tweaks" too numerous to mention but featuring Bybee products and a variety of other products, many of which have the word "quantum" in their description.

The effort to arrive at this point with my system has been two-fold. Firstly, finding the right cables and "tweaks" for the system. Secondly, finding where to place them in the system for the best effects -- a process of trial and error. A lot of cables and "tweaks" had to be sold off in the process. I put "tweaks" in quotation marks because the best "tweaks" in my system have had as profound effect as the components on the sound. The same for the best of the cables, as well. For me, cables and "tweaks" are components.

Have I finally "arrived"? I have just about arrived at the best level that I can expect within my budget -- there are a couple of items on the way. In any case, I assume there are many levels beyond what my system has arrived at. But since I'll never get there I am sitting back and enjoying the music in the blissful recognition that I don't know what I am missing.

I should mention that there are many elements that are as important as holography for the sound to be satisfying, IMO. They include detail, transparency, coherence, tonality, and dynamics, among others. My system has all of these elements in good measure.

Have you had success with holographic sound in your system? If so, how did you get there?
sabai
Simplicity in my experience is the only way to get true organic and holographic sound.

It's about very short signal paths, single stage amps, little or no crossover, well damped components, and as few breaks in the signal path as possible.

Then you get to speaker placement and room correction. The foundation where the bass meets the midrange is very important.

The fine detail that enables the layering and depth of soundstage to come through are very delicate. Any fuzz or phase artefacts will kill those details and when that happens the holographic elements collapse into 2D flat presentation.
Chadeffect,
You stated, "Simplicity in my experience is the only way to get true organic and holographic sound." You don't seem to be leaving the door open to other possibilities that you have not yet experienced.
Sabai,
I wonder how many life times it would take to experience every possibility?

That's why I said "simplicity in my experience..." In other words complex systems in my experience have not been so capable. But I am open to experiencing more.
Sabai,

The only issue I have with your approach is you make it sound like foreever tweaking and adding stuff is a good strategy to follow. I am not so certain. It may work for you, but how is another to replicate your results with that approach? I have to wonder where the difference between better and different lies. I have heard a lot of gear including many very high end or reference type systems. There is only so much that goes into a recording. It is not an infinite pool of undiscovered musical detail as many audiophiles might think. At some point, improvement in one area often negatively impacts others. Wherever it may be, there is a finite limit to how "good" something can sound. A lot has to do with meeting individual expectations that differ much from person to person.

I do not doubt you system sounds great and holographic and whatever else. But I have trouble endorsing a lose strategy that is based on continuous tweaking. Where does it end? does it matter? That depends as well on ones goals. Having no specific goal and always tweaking and changing is as viable as any. Again to me its mostly about enjoyment. I take it seriously as well but once I get to the point where I can clearly hear differences in rrecordings with no real reservations over the long term based on a large sample recordings, I am good to go. My opinion is that powr and IC tweaks are probably required to get to where I like to be. Honestly, I could care less after that especially about things that make no sense to me. Not to say all esoteric tweaks are without basis, some are. All one can do is attempt to make informed decisions based on something that might even possibly resemble a fact. Its when one tweaks and spends just because they "think" they might be missing something and do not know what to do otherwise. At some point it becomes an obsession almost like a drug habit. That is the point at which I would become concerned if it were me.

That's how I feel about it, right or wrong. There are many tweaks out there that may do little or nothing and have no negative effect on teh sound though teh effect on one's bank account might be significant. Or, not. It all depends. Some common sense is usually a good ingredient whatever way one goes.
Mapman, That's how I feel about it too, right or wrong. I believe that adding additional components or cables might bring relieve in some areas but has to lead to overall lack of transparency. I absolutely agree with you that tweaks, at one point, become an obsession. I call it gardener's syndrome - a constant need of trimming and re-potting.

As for the claims of achieving absolutely best sound, many people claim that and it is easy to understand why, since sound is a subjective matter and every hobbyist is proud of achievement.