I did some more testing with Claritycap MR's and Duelund VSF's and am truely
stumped. I had an 6.8uf VSF on my tweeter and the soundstage was amazing, then
I ran 3.3uf, 2.7uf, and .82uf MR's in parallel(to achieve 6.8uf) and the
soundstage sucked. For the hell of it, I decided to lower my crossover freq and
threw a 10uf MR on my tweeters and the soundstage opened up just like the VSF. So it
appears using 3 caps to make up the value I needed could have been the issue. Now with the
MR's, it's more dynamic with a blacker background, with slightly better separation, but sometimes cymbals are a little
sharp. In comparison believe the VSF's may have a slight edge in tonality. Which
leads me to this, has anyone tried both the CAST's and MR's? If the CAST's have all of the
MR's characteristics with the tonality of the VSF, then we have a winner, then the only issue left is cost(ouch!)
Best of all though, my speakers measure even flatter with the larger value, I just hope I don't exponentially lower the life span of my tweeters. :D
stumped. I had an 6.8uf VSF on my tweeter and the soundstage was amazing, then
I ran 3.3uf, 2.7uf, and .82uf MR's in parallel(to achieve 6.8uf) and the
soundstage sucked. For the hell of it, I decided to lower my crossover freq and
threw a 10uf MR on my tweeters and the soundstage opened up just like the VSF. So it
appears using 3 caps to make up the value I needed could have been the issue. Now with the
MR's, it's more dynamic with a blacker background, with slightly better separation, but sometimes cymbals are a little
sharp. In comparison believe the VSF's may have a slight edge in tonality. Which
leads me to this, has anyone tried both the CAST's and MR's? If the CAST's have all of the
MR's characteristics with the tonality of the VSF, then we have a winner, then the only issue left is cost(ouch!)
Best of all though, my speakers measure even flatter with the larger value, I just hope I don't exponentially lower the life span of my tweeters. :D