Hysterisis
I have read about it but what does it mean sound wise?
The vintage inductor is iron core wrapped in paper and wound around the core is wire wrapped in paper.
Some say hysterisis is almost like the plague.
From the Klipsch forum interesting read and not would one would think.
http://forums.klipsch.com/forums/t/38976.aspx
One thing inductors matter more than I thought and not where I thought or in the way I thought.
The vintage is muddier sounding in the bottom end (maybe the higher DCR) yet so far is smoother through the midrange?
I have set the North Creeks on cardboard because I sense ringing? This seems to make the voices rough. One of those things that give more detail but does not add up to more enjoyment? I switched to Audiophile CD's to make sure the inductor is not revealing CD player weakness. In the bass the North Creek is better but might come at a price.
The North Creeks might smooth out as well after all just a few hours. Sounds for sure are crisper and sharper. Piano on the vintage sounds like a blanket is over the piano. The North Creeks though give more HF noise without a doubt!
I did not expect this?
Irish65 I think I know what like about the North Creek's and what was likely better about Duelund that you could not put your finger on. This comparison is going to be very interesting.
For most Klipsch guys that have not replaced your inductor I am not sure I would waste my money. I bet many of the modern inductors with no paper sound wayyyyyy worse than what you have.
So far the vintage is better. The trade offs are much better. Smoother voices more dampening less ringing less of a stark sound. The vintage gives up some detail.
I have wired the speakers up the same to eliminate the caps having any effect.
I have read about it but what does it mean sound wise?
The vintage inductor is iron core wrapped in paper and wound around the core is wire wrapped in paper.
Some say hysterisis is almost like the plague.
From the Klipsch forum interesting read and not would one would think.
http://forums.klipsch.com/forums/t/38976.aspx
One thing inductors matter more than I thought and not where I thought or in the way I thought.
The vintage is muddier sounding in the bottom end (maybe the higher DCR) yet so far is smoother through the midrange?
I have set the North Creeks on cardboard because I sense ringing? This seems to make the voices rough. One of those things that give more detail but does not add up to more enjoyment? I switched to Audiophile CD's to make sure the inductor is not revealing CD player weakness. In the bass the North Creek is better but might come at a price.
The North Creeks might smooth out as well after all just a few hours. Sounds for sure are crisper and sharper. Piano on the vintage sounds like a blanket is over the piano. The North Creeks though give more HF noise without a doubt!
I did not expect this?
Irish65 I think I know what like about the North Creek's and what was likely better about Duelund that you could not put your finger on. This comparison is going to be very interesting.
For most Klipsch guys that have not replaced your inductor I am not sure I would waste my money. I bet many of the modern inductors with no paper sound wayyyyyy worse than what you have.
So far the vintage is better. The trade offs are much better. Smoother voices more dampening less ringing less of a stark sound. The vintage gives up some detail.
I have wired the speakers up the same to eliminate the caps having any effect.