What's Best , Audio Research VT-100 or VT-100 MKII


I have heard that alot of people like the sound of the VT-100 better than the up-dated VT-100 MKII. What do you think? I,m using a Classic 60 with a LS-25 now. I also have a D-70 MKII with a LS-16 that I like quite well.
autospec
I agree with Larryro -- never have I heard anyone say the Mk I was better than the Mk II. It is the opposite -- the Mk II is more powerful with a beefier power supply, a cooling fan, and some circuit changes. It would be more accurate to say that many people prefer the Mk II to either the Mk I or the Mk III. More than once I have heard the Mk III described as Larryro describes it -- perhaps even more resolving than the Mk II, but at a price in the highs. I had a VT-100 Mk II for sale, but changed my mind and kept it. It sounds great.
Well you folks are giving me food for thought, I,m wondering how much differant it sounds compared to a Classic 60. Where I live the Hi-Fi stores do not exist so I can't listen to anything before I buy.
I have a Classic 150 that has been upgraded with Infinicaps by ARC. To me this amp sounds more musical than any of the VT-100 models.
Definetly the VT 2 having upgraded from the 1 although the VT3 is quite an improvment over the 2 IMHO.
I owned the MKI and now, the MKII, which is definitely a better amp in my system. If you are considering a MKI, you may want to check with ARC regarding its production date. During my years with the MKI, I had several factory upgrades including FET's and Infinicaps, which made quite an improvement over the earlier MKI's.